From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] wireless : cpu stuck for 61s
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:53:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1217497994.7813.184.camel@penberg-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240807310250kd2df7bfxa3591cf78e68f8dc@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 12:50 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > There's ath5k in the stack trace but that, of course, doesn't
> > automatically mean it's at fault here. It could have been just the poor
> > bastard who was the next to allocate 4 KB with kmalloc() noticing the
> > corruption.
> >
> > Hope this helps!
>
> I've seen something similar with fragmentation code in iwl4965 but I
> can reproduce it only when using SLAB. With SLUB it didn't shown up.
> Does anyone know what is difference between SLAB and SLUB in this context.?
Do you have CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON enabled? (Note: if you only have
CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG enabled, then you need to enable debugging at run-time
by passing slub_debug to kernel command line.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-31 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-29 5:57 [BUG] wireless : cpu stuck for 61s Dave Young
2008-07-29 12:32 ` Johannes Berg
2008-07-30 9:08 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-30 10:02 ` Dave Young
2008-07-30 10:10 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-31 2:06 ` Dave Young
2008-07-31 2:56 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-31 3:01 ` Dave Young
2008-07-31 9:15 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-07-31 9:50 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-07-31 9:53 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2008-07-31 10:29 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-08-01 7:32 ` Dave Young
2008-08-04 9:22 ` Jiri Slaby
2008-08-04 10:00 ` Jiri Slaby
2008-08-05 1:29 ` Dave Young
2008-08-05 12:24 ` Bob Copeland
2008-08-06 1:51 ` Dave Young
2008-08-06 1:53 ` Dave Young
2008-08-12 4:19 ` Dave Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1217497994.7813.184.camel@penberg-laptop \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hidave.darkstar@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomasw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox