From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from senator.holtmann.net ([87.106.208.187]:56425 "EHLO mail.holtmann.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751082AbYHLGLx (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2008 02:11:53 -0400 Subject: Re: [ipw3945-devel] [PATCH 1/1] iwlwifi: fix printk newlines From: Marcel Holtmann To: Zhu Yi Cc: Jiri Slaby , ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Reinette Chatre In-Reply-To: <1218519496.3107.235.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> References: <1218491381-1313-1-git-send-email-jirislaby@gmail.com> <1218502555.25524.22.camel@californication> <1218504137.3107.201.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> <1218513565.25524.31.camel@californication> <1218519496.3107.235.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:11:58 +0200 Message-Id: <1218521518.25524.37.camel@californication> (sfid-20080812_081156_311997_AAEB6235) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Yi, > > > We should give the users more control to the style I think. > > > > what kind of control do you expect? If you need two lines of debug or > > error output, call IWL_ERROR twice. This will also result in the > > KERN_ERR is set and not forgotten since that has to follow the > > newline. > > I thought sometimes we might not need a new line between two IWL_ERRORs. > But your KERN_ERR garbaging the output in this case is correct. I think > when we wrote the macro, we just follow the style of dev_info() ... > dev_emerg() macros. Do you know why there is not a new line for them by > default? I have no idea. Maybe because they are close to printk. I always put the newline into my macros. Regards Marcel