linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcel Holtmann <holtmann@linux.intel.com>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ipw2100-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhu@intel.com,
	reinette.chatre@intel.com, jgarzik@pobox.com,
	linville@tuxdriver.com, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: Mark IPW2100 as BROKEN: Fatal interrupt. Scheduling firmware restart.
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:27:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1222039667.6782.125.camel@californication> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080921210554.GA2135@2ka.mipt.ru>

Hi Evgeniy,

> > > That allows to dump whatever number of warnings you want. The more we
> > > have, the louder will be customers scream.
> > 
> > artificially increasing numbers isn't going to do that; it just shows
> > you're more interested in making a stink than in getting something
> > improved ;(
> 
> As practice shows, I'm the only one who is interested in getting
> something improved, and Intel, as we see right now, is not interested in
> it at all, since you ask me not only decrease error verbosity, but also
> do not work towards fixing the bug by trying to understand where it
> lives.

as Arjan and Alan pointed out already, WARN_ON_ONCE is enough and I
agree with them. Just to make this perfectly clear, this is with my
community hat on.

Please send a proper patch with a simple WARN_ON_ONCE and I am happy to
sign off on it.

Regards

Marcel



  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-09-21 23:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-21 17:23 Mark IPW2100 as BROKEN: Fatal interrupt. Scheduling firmware restart Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-09-21 17:36 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-21 17:38   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-09-21 18:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-21 18:28   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-09-21 18:35     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-21 18:52       ` Wei Weng
2008-09-21 19:20         ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-21 19:00       ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-09-21 19:14         ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-21 19:38           ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-09-21 19:43             ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-21 20:20               ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-09-21 20:27                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-21 20:57                   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-09-21 21:02                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-21 21:05                       ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-09-21 21:14                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-21 21:43                         ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-09-21 22:07                           ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-09-21 22:15                             ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-09-21 23:46                               ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-09-21 23:27                         ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2008-09-22  0:00                           ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-09-21 22:38                     ` Alan Cox
2008-09-21 23:44                       ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-09-21 23:48                         ` David Miller
2008-09-22  0:18                           ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-09-21 20:05             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-21 20:26               ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-09-21 20:35                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-21 21:06                   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-09-21 19:57         ` Alan Cox
2008-09-21 21:10           ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-09-26  5:56           ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-09-21 19:35 ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-09-21 21:12   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-09-21 22:45   ` Matthew Garrett
2008-09-21 22:42 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-09-21 23:45   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-09-22 16:21 ` [Ipw2100-devel] " Kenneth Crudup

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1222039667.6782.125.camel@californication \
    --to=holtmann@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ipw2100-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).