From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>
Cc: John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFT] iwlagn: remove pointless TX frame check
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:14:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1223630089.3930.71.camel@johannes.berg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240810091308r167b9147p46f74421329a55c1@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20081009_220831_876301_EA9D5BD1)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 919 bytes --]
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 22:08 +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Johannes Berg
> <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> > mac80211 will not send data frames on a STA mode interface
> > that is not associated because the queue for it is stopped,
> > and all remaining data frames that might be sent, e.g. by
> > packet injection, are accepted here anyway, so remove this
> > pointless check. Also hold the spinlock for less time.
> >
> > This will with great probability improve performance in the
> > driver more than the proper descriptor layout can possibly
> > cost.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> > ---
> > Haven't tested this so far, so RFT, but I'm fairly certain it's correct.
>
>
> NACK, the completion of association of mac80211 and iwlagn isn't fully
> synchronized so there is still
> a race.
Can we fix that?
johannes
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-10 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-09 10:22 [PATCH/RFT] iwlagn: remove pointless TX frame check Johannes Berg
2008-10-09 20:08 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-10-10 9:14 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2008-10-23 20:42 ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-06 12:30 ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-06 14:41 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-11-06 14:45 ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-06 14:53 ` Tomas Winkler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1223630089.3930.71.camel@johannes.berg \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=tomasw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox