From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: splitting out the 3945 RC algorithm from the driver
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:30:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1223652652.3748.21.camel@johannes.berg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240810100801i7886be3cq7376881951fdec36@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20081010_170154_636889_D3FCC4B2)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1391 bytes --]
> > There are a few difficulties:
> > * the RC algorithm is responsible for adding IBSS stations to the
> > firmware, this is pure design stupidity and must be fixed anyway
> First please again stop this language, you are not telling us
> something that we don't know.
> There is history how things are developed and there is time for
> everything to change. It wasn't stupid when it was develped mac80211
> then what it is now.
See, that's where we clearly disagree. It _was_ stupid even back when it
was initially written. We discussed this back then and you wrote a
trivial patch to have mac80211 do the sta_notify call as required. But
then you already has this code and didn't bother cleaning it up when it
was possible.
This is a development process issue, and partially comes from you doing
so much "invisible" development in-house, and partially from John being
way to lenient with you and accepting such hacks, in the hope you'll
clean them up. Well guess what, it's now well over a year later and you
haven't. If you don't live up to such promises, how can we take your
development process seriously?
The normal process that we make everybody else go through would be to
post "oh, there's some API missing that we need", then you post that API
and get it in, and _then_ you do the stuff that relies on it.
You need to get that.
johannes
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-10 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-10 9:44 splitting out the 3945 RC algorithm from the driver Johannes Berg
2008-10-10 15:01 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-10-10 15:30 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1223652652.3748.21.camel@johannes.berg \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomasw@gmail.com \
--cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox