From: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Cc: Luis Rodriguez <Luis.Rodriguez@atheros.com>,
Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <holtmann@linux.intel.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"Kolekar, Abhijeet" <abhijeet.kolekar@intel.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: New Regulatory Domain Api.
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:18:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1224479933.24677.148.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43e72e890810192040w567fa4f6j1bf40e80084a857e@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 20:40 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 04:38 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >> So.. you didn't look at the code to check where it may have failed...
> >
> > IIRC, below patch changes the previously allowing none 5GHz channels to
> > allowing all 5GHZ channels. It does resolve our problem. But is it the
> > correct behaviour? Or did I miss anything?
>
> Well if you are using regulatory_hint() and only have rules defined in
> the 2 GHz band then yes it won't ever touch 5 GHz channels... I don't
> like this at all but its what I thought you were asking for.
No, with this patch the 5GHz reg_rules on the second card are bypassed
by regdomain. This is not correct. I do like to see the new regdomain
handles all valid usage models correctly. But I fail to see how it can
be with the current design (the first one wins, or do intersection). We
should do intersection within each band, but do union between bands.
Thanks,
-yi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-20 5:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-09 22:17 New Regulatory Domain Api Kolekar, Abhijeet
2008-10-09 15:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-10 3:22 ` Zhu Yi
2008-10-10 16:49 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-14 6:59 ` Zhu Yi
2008-10-14 7:04 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-14 7:36 ` Zhu Yi
2008-10-14 9:04 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-14 9:13 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-14 9:23 ` Zhu Yi
2008-10-14 9:27 ` Zhu Yi
2008-10-14 9:32 ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-14 9:30 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-14 20:35 ` John W. Linville
2008-10-14 21:15 ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-14 21:19 ` John W. Linville
2008-10-14 21:27 ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-14 21:50 ` John W. Linville
2008-10-14 21:57 ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-15 15:46 ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-10-15 15:59 ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-15 17:26 ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-10-15 17:39 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-15 17:45 ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-15 18:11 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-15 17:47 ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-10-15 11:25 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-15 19:25 ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-10-15 13:16 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-15 23:31 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-10-15 17:08 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-16 0:35 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-10-15 17:44 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-16 0:57 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-10-15 18:56 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-16 3:00 ` Zhu Yi
2008-10-16 11:38 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-20 2:51 ` Zhu Yi
2008-10-20 3:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-20 5:18 ` Zhu Yi [this message]
2008-10-20 6:33 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-20 6:38 ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-20 6:46 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-20 6:50 ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-20 6:59 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-20 7:22 ` Zhu Yi
2008-10-20 16:43 ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-10-21 1:34 ` Zhu Yi
2008-10-21 1:42 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-21 1:58 ` Zhu Yi
2008-10-21 2:37 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-21 4:02 ` Zhu Yi
2008-10-21 4:58 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-21 5:28 ` Zhu Yi
2008-10-21 6:02 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-21 6:46 ` Zhu Yi
2008-10-21 6:07 ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-10-21 6:29 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-21 6:51 ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-10-21 17:13 ` John W. Linville
2008-10-21 17:43 ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-10-21 17:48 ` John W. Linville
2008-10-21 11:02 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-21 18:05 ` John W. Linville
2008-10-21 11:21 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-22 9:20 ` Zhu Yi
2008-10-22 10:13 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-23 2:29 ` Zhu Yi
2008-10-21 6:40 ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-21 6:47 ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-10-21 7:05 ` Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <79124FD53D2E084387D88C71BEB48F3EDD3625@CPEXBE-EML29.kpnsp.local>
2008-10-21 7:37 ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-21 16:39 ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-10-21 11:04 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-21 16:40 ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-15 17:40 ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-15 2:00 ` Zhu Yi
2008-10-14 9:19 ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-15 1:40 ` Zhu Yi
2008-10-15 15:50 ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-10-15 16:01 ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-15 17:29 ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-10-15 17:36 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1224479933.24677.148.camel@debian.sh.intel.com \
--to=yi.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=Luis.Rodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=abhijeet.kolekar@intel.com \
--cc=holtmann@linux.intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=tomasw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).