From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:60645 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750966AbYJTIEa (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:04:30 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mac80211/drivers: rewrite the rate control API From: Zhu Yi To: Johannes Berg Cc: John Linville , linux-wireless , Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan , Felix Fietkau In-Reply-To: <1224486587.18024.25.camel@johannes.berg> References: <1223996147.10113.33.camel@johannes.berg> (sfid-20081014_165703_092655_BE6BA58D) <1224052607.3027.20.camel@johannes.berg> <1224484940.24677.169.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> <1224485319.18024.9.camel@johannes.berg> <1224486368.24677.184.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> <1224486587.18024.25.camel@johannes.berg> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:04:04 +0800 Message-Id: <1224489844.24677.225.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> (sfid-20081020_100447_024798_FDD59D4F) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 01:09 -0600, Johannes Berg wrote: > Yes, I know that much, but can you tell us how exactly? I don't know the details either. Will follow up on this. > It would be good to actually report as accurate as possible (up to > MAX_RATES) the retries the firmware will have done. We're going to > export that information to userland in radiotap too. Sounds like a good idea. The actual number of retried rates should depend on hardware/firmware. But '5' doesn't look like the possible MAX. Thanks, -yi