From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Weird wireless/wpa_supplicant screw-up.
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:06:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <12262.1268795213@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:09:09 PST." <1268449749.4880.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2194 bytes --]
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:09:09 PST, Johannes Berg said:
> No ... look at _all_ that it produces.
>
> [ 98.592575] In giwencode idx=0 keys=ffff88001b304000 cipher=0
> [ 98.592580] And we're going home...
> *****
> [ 98.592633] In giwencode idx=1 keys=ffff88001b304000 cipher=fac04
> *****
> [ 98.592749] In giwencode idx=2 keys=ffff88001b304000 cipher=0
> [ 98.592751] And we're going home...
> [ 98.592803] In giwencode idx=3 keys=ffff88001b304000 cipher=0
> [ 98.592805] And we're going home...
> [ 98.592856] In giwencode idx=0 keys=ffff88001b304000 cipher=0
> [ 98.592859] And we're going home...
>
> See? It reports one key which is the RX-only group key which is
> absolutely correct.
It matches what 'iwlist keys' reports, but I remain unconvinced of
its "correctness". If a TX key has been set anyplace, what allows me
to verify that it was in fact set?
> > So the root cause has something to do with params[idx].cipher being unset.
>
> Not at all.
I was referring to the root cause of why 'iwlist keys' wasn't reporting
anything for the other 3 key slots.
> GIWENCODE is 100% unsuitable for WPA. Just forget about "iwlist key".
Feel free to point me at the officially approved substitute.
> And then we'd like to know what the actual problem is.
The problem is that I do 'iwconfig', and I see:
Encryption key:off
And if I do 'iwlist keys', I don't see a TX key listed, which certainly gives
the at least the impression that we're not encrypting outbound traffic. If I'm
not supposed to trust 'iwconfig' or 'iwlist key' to tell me whether WPA2
traffic is in fact encrypted or not, what *am* I supposed to use instead?
There's two possibilities:
1) iwconfig and iwlist keys are correctly reporting I don't have a TX key
set - which means wpa_supplicant and/or the kernel is failing to get the
key set, which is a problem.
2) iwconfig and iwlist are lying through their teeth, and reporting there
isn't any key set when in fact there is. This is still a problem because it
implies to users their traffic isn't secured.
I'll point out that until fairly recently 'iwconfig' *did* report a key for
WPA2, so this looks like a regression on somebody's part.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-17 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-08 22:22 Weird wireless/wpa_supplicant screw-up Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-03-12 11:14 ` Johannes Berg
2010-03-12 11:16 ` Johannes Berg
2010-03-12 21:49 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-03-12 22:19 ` Pavel Roskin
2010-03-12 22:22 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-03-13 3:09 ` Johannes Berg
2010-03-17 3:06 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2010-03-17 3:22 ` Johannes Berg
2010-03-17 8:21 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-03-17 9:03 ` Holger Schurig
2010-03-17 20:29 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=12262.1268795213@localhost \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).