Re: Userspace tools: Roadmap?

["Dan E" <trg_info@mailhaven.com>]

On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:13:13 +0100, "Johannes Berg"
<johannes@sipsolutions.net> said:
> 
> Not really, in the short term, you still are using iwconfig (wireless
> extensions) with anything but hostapd.

Ugh.  I was afraid you were going to say that.

> > Userspace tools.  I want to proceed as if Wireless Extensions never
> > existed.  Is that even possible?
> 
> No, it's not.

My fault for assuming too much about the urgency to get away from WE.

> Yes, it should, and nl80211 even supports it, but iw itself doesn't yet.
> That's fairly easy to fix, too, but then iw won't support actually
> telling mac80211 to scan and associate etc.

Right.  I had a few early problems with iw.  For instance, the Linux
Wireless web pages say you need "at least" libnl-1.0-pre8, but it won't
build with libnl-1.2 or 2.0.  I had to go with libnl-1.1 to make it
happy.  iw seems to be like a redheaded stepchild.

> If you're writing a mac80211-based driver, there's no point where you
> could possibly get in touch with the userspace API. You're writing the
> driver completely to mac80211's internal driver API, and mac80211
> completely shields you from the userspace API. You'll never interact
> with either wireless extensions or nl80211.
> 
> > If somone could answer only 1 question (okay, it's a two-parter) the one
> > I would most like answered is this:  How does one, from userspace, ask
> > the driver to switch to a specific channel, and what callback(s) from
> > mac80211 should my driver expect to receive as a result?  
> 
> iwconfig wlan0 channel 7
> 
> then mac80211 calls your _ops->config() with the channel flag. Have you
> looked at the mac80211 book and the other documentation on
> http://wireless.kernel.org/?

That's what I thought but I wasn't seeing any callbacks at all through
my ieee80211_ops pointers.  I did see the channel frequency change with
'iwconfig wlan0', but no callbacks.  My fault, again, for not RTFM.  I
haven't gotten to the point yet on my driver where I expect 'ip link set
up dev wlan0' (or 'ifconfig wlan0 up', if you prefer) and now I see
that's why the config callback never happened.  If I had RTFM I might
have noticed adding 'commit' at the end of the iwconfig command would
have done it without the 'up'.

Thanks for the info, Johannes.  It answers a lot of my questions.

--
Dan

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Access your email from home and the web