From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:49781 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751267AbYLXBQu (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2008 20:16:50 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "iwl3945: remove iwl-3945-led.[ch]" From: Zhu Yi To: "John W. Linville" Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" In-Reply-To: <20081223213734.GB12572@tuxdriver.com> References: <1230000441-15977-1-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <20081223213734.GB12572@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:18:14 +0800 Message-Id: <1230081494.2570.64.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> (sfid-20081224_021655_404470_D033AE52) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 05:37 +0800, John W. Linville wrote: > > This reverts commit b3489137ec7dabe4531c4344347270857301e209. This > > fixes the iwl3945 scan regression reported by Kalle Valo. > > Would it be best if I just didn't apply that patch in the first place? Sure. Just the patches after this one might not be applied cleanly. But it's obvious to fix. Thanks, -yi