From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:30892 "EHLO c60.cesmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755900AbYL1V2I (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:28:08 -0500 Subject: Re: status of at76-usb driver From: Pavel Roskin To: Kalle Valo Cc: Claudio , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH In-Reply-To: <87fxk8o2g0.fsf@litku.valot.fi> References: <1230411118.4956956ecb911@webmail.aon.at> <87fxk8o2g0.fsf@litku.valot.fi> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:28:03 -0500 Message-Id: <1230499683.25726.4.camel@dv> (sfid-20081228_222814_879299_4F3C46F3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 15:26 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > Also I'm going to rename the mac80211 port to something else for just > to avoid the confusion with the original driver. Last thing I want to > see is having two in-tree drivers with identical names. I asked to rename the driver that was imported into the staging tree, but my request was ignored. I guess nobody really cares about the name conflict. I'll appreciate if we avoid further renames. Once the mac80211 port is working properly, it should be included in to the next kernel release, and the driver from the staging tree should be removed in the same kernel release. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin