From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from senator.holtmann.net ([87.106.208.187]:44173 "EHLO mail.holtmann.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754760AbZABOKR (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:10:17 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2x00: Fix radio LED type check From: Marcel Holtmann To: Ivo Van Doorn Cc: Andrew Price , "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <20090102080527.GA16585@silver.sucs.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:10:14 +0100 Message-Id: <1230905414.15391.39.camel@californication> (sfid-20090102_151023_427303_FD8BAAD7) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Ivo, > > Since commit 9a95dba32735534bda59def40c747bf606fedf05 "rt2x00: Fix LED > > state handling", rt2x00leds_led_radio wrongly checks that the LED type > > is LED_TYPE_ASSOC. This patch makes it check for LED_TYPE_RADIO once > > again. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Price > > Good catch. Thanks. > > Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn small comment from my side here. Signed-off-by is only suppose to be used if you pick up the patch and then send it to John by yourself. If you just wanna indicate that it is fine for John to pick up this patch, then it should be an Acked-by: line. The Signed-off-by should indicate the steps (aka persons) this patch when through until it reached Linus. This doesn't include people testing or acknowledging a patch. Regards Marcel