From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:19526 "EHLO c60.cesmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760121AbZANWCa (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:02:30 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] ath9k: add preliminary support for the AR913x SoCs From: Pavel Roskin To: Gabor Juhos Cc: "John W. Linville" , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Jouni Malinen , "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Felix Fietkau , Christoph Hellwig , Sujith Manoharan , Johannes Berg In-Reply-To: <496E39C2.8040208@openwrt.org> References: <1231854029-26810-1-git-send-email-juhosg@openwrt.org> <1231882731.21706.10.camel@dv> <496E39C2.8040208@openwrt.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:02:09 -0500 Message-Id: <1231970529.4269.26.camel@dv> (sfid-20090114_230255_905831_B498FB45) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 20:15 +0100, Gabor Juhos wrote: > Yes. I will post a new set. Thanks! > I have noticed it, but i'm not a Perl expert, so I have checked the patches > with checkpatch.pl from 2.6.28. I've got a reply from checkpatch.pl maintainer. The fixed file is at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/apw/checkpatch/checkpatch.pl-testing It has no problems with the new patchset. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin