From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from xc.sipsolutions.net ([83.246.72.84]:48316 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758357AbZAPUdI (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:33:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] cfg80211: remove check for last_request on ignore_reg_update() From: Johannes Berg To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Luis Rodriguez , "linville@tuxdriver.com" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <20090116162731.GD29609@tesla> References: <1232064746-17134-3-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <1232064746-17134-4-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <1232064746-17134-5-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <1232064746-17134-6-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <1232064746-17134-7-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <1232064746-17134-8-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <1232064746-17134-9-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <1232064746-17134-10-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <1232064746-17134-11-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <1232097990.3854.31.camel@johannes> <20090116162731.GD29609@tesla> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-1CE+S9rQROIj19Bt0k1G" Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:33:00 +0100 Message-Id: <1232137980.3745.3.camel@johannes> (sfid-20090116_213315_770003_294D7200) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-1CE+S9rQROIj19Bt0k1G Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 08:27 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 01:26:30AM -0800, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 16:12 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > There is no need to check for last_request as the callers of > > > update_all_wiphy_regulatory() ensure its present. > >=20 > > Are you sure? I had all this blow up all around me. >=20 > Interesting -- well that's the thing, where and why would it have blown u= p? > I did test it and didn't run into it. Only w/o crda and old-regulatory did I see that happen though, not sure. johannes --=-1CE+S9rQROIj19Bt0k1G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJJcO75AAoJEKVg1VMiehFYISsQAK7ng+zDsIvXfjugLyvefzTd 6O3badYG0Ec6enkcIjlIHmFgEVN0jjWnVuj/H8pqfemFHr32Rv5WaH6oveqR4mK5 4IaQflxi+saPNMjFmdCbzdZQuDvfkELLJSgSq5HXNGmr/6H8/LpcprEYvX4Av6Aw IHnGW8WbhjYDKBXcTRwPrGekJ8Jl0hbwGnW1tEb+KA32XMcRu7fY5DCxQytnpmcZ XCNa8doL9fkXg1gUsIxeqVNWRTzixEDzTZa7Vyvtst6exkBg/IHEvaU5UrzCVyhW 3nUfl/xaJOOYqYPC/qISSgUnsEPDBB4Yrz01g/OHxVejqdHqnbCdTKXm7qkU7l6m wMrA/JH+iVT51wdPsCP0d8hAWG7AF+tcoeyXrgIA+C83dcWEbBhOcp4/+XySJEJW MiUvdv22AAyiITusbxUkIHmoSXpYS866XVzIkT9bMnGtjE/NcesvM1grAJZc3n/j RMPvoE2cUHTnPcXsfKRosJfbiBkVLNCrCcN/tq3fpfY02tiQL4Lk0kqLZ9jVKLLe 2r1mNkKsA6NMQl2KecmRbfhC+xLWdNrXch/8kA5B5rVU2AV8DFzPobdE8NE3AbEc zZX4zCh8BNYLrS5L43/mo5w09wJSygZD0vF5SN4hl1EvBIqX2f7DtGafr0BAr5MC OhfHOqfswzV/vhj7yrBd =5l+j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-1CE+S9rQROIj19Bt0k1G--