From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from xc.sipsolutions.net ([83.246.72.84]:49362 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753320AbZA2OYT (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:24:19 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] crda: rename nl_handle to nl_sock for libnl-2.0 From: Johannes Berg To: pat-lkml Cc: linux-wireless In-Reply-To: <4980FAB3.9050706@erley.org> References: <4980EDC8.4050204@erley.org> (sfid-20090129_004437_360979_B9D4728F) <1233187526.16048.95.camel@johannes.local> <4980F67C.70207@erley.org> <1233189164.16048.106.camel@johannes.local> <4980FAB3.9050706@erley.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-HinyabmmIMhHwWeScipt" Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:37:51 +0100 Message-Id: <1233236271.3912.1.camel@johannes.local> (sfid-20090129_152423_995581_77BB5215) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-HinyabmmIMhHwWeScipt Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 19:39 -0500, pat-lkml wrote: > Which leads back around to my question, should I continue pushing > patches like this your way (after making sure the right patch is on the > right e-mail with the right description),=20 Heh :) Also make sure your patch isn't line-wrapped next time, please. The iw resend was line-wrapped. > or do we want to wait and I'll > just maintain the patches outside of git, and push them once libnl-2.0 > hits? On one hand, it makes testing both versions easier, on the other, > it makes a lot of little 'fix' commits like this. I have no issues > maintaining these sorts of patches, but I don't want to do it if you > don't want them. No, it's fine, I've committed this now, thanks. I had just thought it ought to work, based on testing with git snapshot a couple of weeks ago... Not that libnl-2.0 compiles cleanly on my system... johannes --=-HinyabmmIMhHwWeScipt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJJgbEsAAoJEKVg1VMiehFYbP8P/j9YAmIWLBDTLmojNK307rFQ byFoLnNiype8Jm+y3Hvh+9+PO8sfztw5Skkaw3CAojfJJTEZ3GlNg3fiqfvvTspg jtYhRtGUI+KYDvyoCSnzeBpRSDuLwLfSgrs9syKus4x9JyNnlk4KXYJLCduZS8Zz doOdSeFLw32Vkn0C25/QslhlgnqBenni5tiksvSDufDo644Fldn1mdTTlB+JWa59 43kG7UxcpXhE0ZFtoIOPrf921G0GXdCFSj3V5hUOsDpAxn5M/PrjXyxXIWVCh5e/ RZRvYI13tQiqTbCwYjcN1tjmVttGF7oFqTki5CPAkEO6RMbGfOwcRc3Y+BDEybA0 xBcN3JY1SUehnm9nh6FH7f2ocG1ZZy/9iFLuMhPxj0OmRZOE3CXbaOM/agBGDNKL Sj6pKc0Hw3r7hTyizyCmfWX0uvCeL3RWDEv8Ng2M1N0sQ9fLHeecnJt2Mz9Vt78M mTpYtYbKjxIUllw/yFPuJ5+01WzWijp8aUhPFZz//CWCRsgeY1aw/Kckhx74z9Ge yuXGCUBDIT9n2WeTkWjdmfTi/sAJe9kXpB1A5jtp7KqP3zxckxLD4gDuyO5fojdZ nWUAtX/sXjrz3myGvPaYiKqU4ycRe+gYM1EsQQNIJtAnpojYxRqLKG4Sva9k+fwV 2y0ZEXjp1jOC4bSllcck =Vyy6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-HinyabmmIMhHwWeScipt--