Re: [PATCH] ipw2x00: age scan results on resume

[Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>]

On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 13:35 -0800, reinette chatre wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 07:36 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Scanned BSS entries are timestamped with jiffies, which doesn't
> > increment across suspend and hibernate.  On resume, every BSS in the
> > scan list looks like it was scanned within the last 10 seconds,
> > irregardless of how long the machine was actually asleep.  Age scan
> > results on resume with the time spent during sleep so userspace has a
> > clue how old they really are.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
> 
> This makes sense.
> 
> > ---
> > This fixes NetworkManager and wpa_supplicant trying to connect to the AP
> > associated with at suspend/hibernate time, which clearly may not exist
> > at the location where the machine is waking up.
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2100.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2100.c
> > index 823c2bf..abf897d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2100.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2100.c
> > @@ -1692,7 +1692,13 @@ static int ipw2100_up(struct ipw2100_priv *priv, int deferred)
> >  	u32 lock;
> >  	u32 ord_len = sizeof(lock);
> >  
> > -	/* Quite if manually disabled. */
> > +	/* Age scan list entries found before suspend */
> > +	if (priv->suspend_time) {
> > +		ieee80211_networks_age(priv->ieee, priv->suspend_time);
> > +		priv->suspend_time = 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Quiet if manually disabled. */
> >  	if (priv->status & STATUS_RF_KILL_SW) {
> >  		IPW_DEBUG_INFO("%s: Radio is disabled by Manual Disable "
> >  			       "switch\n", priv->net_dev->name);
> > @@ -6414,6 +6420,9 @@ static int ipw2100_suspend(struct pci_dev *pci_dev, pm_message_t state)
> >  	pci_disable_device(pci_dev);
> >  	pci_set_power_state(pci_dev, PCI_D3hot);
> >  
> > +	if (!priv->suspend_at)
> > +		priv->suspend_at = get_seconds();
> > +
> 
> I do not see where suspend_at is reset. Would that not confuse things
> when you suspend two or more times?

Ah right; left over from a previous iteration.  Thanks for the catch.

Dan