Re: [RFC] b43: rework rfkill code

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-12-10T21:33:39Z

On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 18:23 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > Then there's user_claim_unsupported which is set by all drivers but
> > rt2x00, probably because they have hardware kill switches and thus they
> > have to set it even if it's not strictly true, because of the lacking
> > separation between these things (that I pointed out)
>
> IOW, correct me if I'm wrong, it seems to me that user_claim_unsupported
> really is a wrong name for "has hw kill", which could be avoided if sw

I never understood what user_claim_unsupported is for. I left it alone
because of that, but it looks like some artifact of the old rfkill that did
horrible things to the input layer.

--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh