linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@linux.intel.com>,
	Dirk Opfer <Dirk@Opfer-Online.de>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] rfkill: rewrite
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:41:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1238434878.5970.17.camel@johannes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090330173421.GB23749@khazad-dum.debian.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 939 bytes --]

[remove memebeam.org from CC, it doesn't have an MX]

Hi Henrique,

> There are three independent rfkill controllers in a thinkpad: UWB, WWAN,
> bluetooth.  They're hierarchically slaved to the master radio-kill switch in
> the standard EPO way:  if the master switch is active, all rfkill
> controllers are forced active (all radios are killed).  If the master switch
> is not active, each rfkill controller can be independently set to kill or
> not their respective radio.

[snip]

Thanks for the explanation. I guess that kinda makes sense. One thing
I'm entirely sure about -- I had removed the sw default state setter --
I guess this code still requires then? I was thinking the sw default
state should be set for the devices it applies to, but it seems that if
the master rfkill switch is set to "transmitter off" then one needs to
set the default state (for all USB transmitters etc) to off, correct?

johannes

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-30 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-29 17:53 [RFC] rfkill: rewrite Johannes Berg
2009-03-29 18:16 ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-03-30 13:27   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-03-30  9:06 ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-30  9:54   ` Michael Buesch
2009-03-30  9:57     ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-30 10:39       ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-30  9:40 ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-30 10:04   ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-30 13:29   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-03-30 14:08     ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-30 17:34       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-03-30 17:41         ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2009-03-30 20:48           ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-03-30 20:52             ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-30 21:02               ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-03-30 21:20                 ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-30 17:39   ` Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
2009-03-30 17:45     ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-30 17:54       ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-03-30 18:00         ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-30 20:36           ` Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
2009-03-30 20:43             ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-30 20:52       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-03-30 19:01   ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-30 22:07   ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-30 22:08   ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-30 21:15 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-03-30 21:26   ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-30 21:26   ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-05 14:59   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-04-07 10:36     ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-08 18:06       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-04-14 21:03         ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-30 22:16 ` [RFC/RFT v2] " Johannes Berg
2009-03-30 23:20   ` Larry Finger
2009-03-31  8:02     ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-31  8:11       ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-31 12:16   ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-31 18:20   ` Larry Finger
2009-03-31 18:32     ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-31 19:11 ` [RFC v3] " Johannes Berg
2009-04-14 21:48 ` [RFC v5] " Johannes Berg
2009-04-14 23:08   ` [RFC v6] " Johannes Berg
2009-04-15  4:34     ` Larry Finger
2009-04-30  3:19     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-04-30  8:53       ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-30 14:11         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-04-30 14:18           ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-30 15:06       ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-30 15:53         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-04-30 16:09           ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-30 15:14       ` [RFC v8] " Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1238434878.5970.17.camel@johannes.local \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=Dirk@Opfer-Online.de \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=inaky@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).