From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: Nico -telmich- Schottelius
<nico-linux-ipw3945-devel@schottelius.org>,
Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@nokia.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ipw3945-devel] 2.6.29-wl-36116-g6a982a0: connection loss
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:20:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1238520041.5970.112.camel@johannes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1238519733.10366.32.camel@rc-desk> (sfid-20090331_191007_889953_E44BBA1F)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3552 bytes --]
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 10:15 -0700, reinette chatre wrote:
> Adding Kalle and the linux-wireless list ... if anybody responds who is
> not member of ipw3945 ml, please consider removing that ml from cc list.
> If anybody on ipw3945 are interested in this, please follow thread on
> linux-wireless.
> > [ 3009.365039] wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32 try 1
> > [ 3009.368315] wlan0 direct probe responded
> > [ 3009.368321] wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32
> > [ 3009.370298] wlan0: authenticated
> > [ 3009.370304] wlan0: associate with AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32
> > [ 3009.568063] wlan0: associate with AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32
> > [ 3009.575107] wlan0: RX AssocResp from 00:14:6c:67:9c:32 (capab=0x601 status=0 aid=10)
> > [ 3009.575114] wlan0: associated
There the connection is already not entirely reliable -- needed two
assoc messages to get through, despite retries.
> > [ 3009.581276] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready
> > [ 3020.000031] wlan0: no IPv6 routers present
> > [ 3151.295473] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32 - sending probe request
> > [ 4191.742593] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32 - sending probe request
> > [ 4193.740066] wlan0: no probe response from AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32 - disassociating
Here you have (look at the times!) the probe request once getting an
answer, and once not.
> > [ 4321.376160] wlan0: deauthenticated (Reason: 7)
> > [ 7337.805893] wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32 try 1
> > [ 7337.810976] wlan0 direct probe responded
> > [ 7337.810983] wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32
> > [ 7338.008060] wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32
> > [ 7338.010087] wlan0: authenticated
> > [ 7338.010093] wlan0: associate with AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32
> > [ 7338.018590] wlan0: RX ReassocResp from 00:14:6c:67:9c:32 (capab=0x201 status=0 aid=13)
> > [ 7338.018597] wlan0: associated
Here auth needs two tries.
> > [ 7572.146385] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32 - sending probe request
> > [ 7702.189368] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32 - sending probe request
> > [ 7962.173161] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32 - sending probe request
> > [ 8092.216232] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32 - sending probe request
> > [ 8094.216137] wlan0: no probe response from AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32 - disassociating
Here you have three probe requests over quite some time sometimes
getting answers and at the last time not.
> > [ 8221.952208] wlan0: deauthenticated (Reason: 7)
> > [33012.904311] wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32 try 1
> > [33012.907527] wlan0 direct probe responded
> > [33012.907533] wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32
> > [33013.104059] wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32
> > [33013.106102] wlan0: authenticated
> > [33013.106107] wlan0: associate with AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32
> > [33013.114796] wlan0: RX ReassocResp from 00:14:6c:67:9c:32 (capab=0x201 status=0 aid=14)
> > [33013.114802] wlan0: associated
> > [33053.635621] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32 - sending probe request
> > [33183.267415] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:14:6c:67:9c:32 - sending probe request
etc.
> Perhaps the new beacon filtering work [1] is changing more than it
> intended?
I think it only changed the messages here. Previously, that message
simply wouldn't have been there, instead you'd only have seen the "No
ProbeResp from current AP - assume out of range" thing.
johannes
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-31 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090331044946.GA10616@denkbrett.schottelius.org>
2009-03-31 17:15 ` [ipw3945-devel] 2.6.29-wl-36116-g6a982a0: connection loss reinette chatre
2009-03-31 17:20 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2009-03-31 17:45 ` Kalle Valo
2009-03-31 17:57 ` Christian Lamparter
2009-03-31 18:01 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1238520041.5970.112.camel@johannes.local \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kalle.valo@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nico-linux-ipw3945-devel@schottelius.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).