From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from xc.sipsolutions.net ([83.246.72.84]:36133 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751562AbZDKLeO (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:34:14 -0400 Subject: Re: attempt to scan fails (device busy) if essid/ssid was changed recently From: Johannes Berg To: Maxim Levitsky Cc: linux-wireless In-Reply-To: <1239395434.13792.3.camel@maxim-laptop> (sfid-20090410_223110_294055_69850902) References: <1239062401.4705.23.camel@maxim-laptop> (sfid-20090407_020013_939126_90578556) <1239092296.22453.1.camel@johannes.local> <1239108689.15015.3.camel@maxim-laptop> (sfid-20090407_145137_740898_8D0C40FD) <1239109001.22453.40.camel@johannes.local> <1239109497.15015.12.camel@maxim-laptop> (sfid-20090407_150534_375314_4DA28551) <1239110010.22453.41.camel@johannes.local> <1239110412.15015.23.camel@maxim-laptop> (sfid-20090407_152021_060436_AEF9110F) <1239110860.4084.0.camel@johannes.local> <1239112310.15015.25.camel@maxim-laptop> <1239135878.17958.11.camel@maxim-laptop> (sfid-20090407_222443_633750_085B264D) <1239136637.7475.57.camel@johannes.local> <1239395434.13792.3.camel@maxim-laptop> (sfid-20090410_223110_294055_69850902) Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cIiVCE7xJKDOing6CbRd" Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 13:34:11 +0200 Message-Id: <1239449651.17031.42.camel@johannes.local> (sfid-20090411_133417_212159_B921F452) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-cIiVCE7xJKDOing6CbRd Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 23:30 +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > It is. >=20 > I have just compiled iwlwifi.git tree, and same message is there: >=20 >=20 >=20 > > [ 1666.298390] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > [ 1666.298395] WARNING: at /home/maxim/software/kernel/linux-2.6/net/wi= reless/core.h:79 nl80211_send_wiphy+0x8bd/0xa20 [cfg80211]() > > [ 1666.298399] Hardware name: Aspire 5720 =20 > > [ 1666.298473] Pid: 13164, comm: wpa_supplicant Tainted: P 2.= 6.29-wl #19 > > [ 1666.298477] Call Trace: > > [ 1666.298490] [] warn_slowpath+0xd0/0x130 > > [ 1666.298504] [] ? nl80211_get_wiphy+0x56/0xd0 [cfg= 80211] > > [ 1666.298512] [] ? __alloc_pages_internal+0xe3/0x4f= 0 > > [ 1666.298525] [] nl80211_send_wiphy+0x8bd/0xa20 [cf= g80211] Then your stacktrace is crap -- please apply the patch I just sent you. > On top of that I need to note that NM doesn't show signal strenghts > correctly. > Instead it shows 100% for all AP except the current active one. Separate thing -- don't hide it in this thread. I'll not even think about looking at it here. johannes --=-cIiVCE7xJKDOing6CbRd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJJ4IAxAAoJEKVg1VMiehFY334QALQJkG7apQeycmp9qmTBs7D1 qW6anewEsc++yTamU1/8TS7PBMTx5+fI+7NXq8c5LKnkkIJsrWR/a18q0jyTUN9I SSH7m4Y6x20qLm4ZNbPS0+hYwaukAtlfK2ebqlJ5NjLXea6mNesn1nQ22s7/ivt4 HipzY8cmxt4x+TDD4IvpQEhieCZagqM5VlUBvd6INrUpm616VeAGpPRXG5JNrnkf PvrWT2QFk7karxfF7OVANzyPLbqfVw1TsTiGeouVWJMw6/qUHRV93Uf9mFvfFBrq F0Kf1pw212EEFWD85k6mfz+Z+enTEjd6Ib2k9RzmuA+hcxaREQLQtIkC1i4syyBq S4TRcQwVZ2CSLUa7ZrCjAlGnXIcDvWXYrj7HzJ94qAW4KDH28w1oThMjzu1AoGeW GteRy52XhleZdlzDrWURYlq05oidnMyFS1QTgsV5FtkdZGhsbuX6cXVNqVpPiOjI HNIPxTS1k0RCSod0eX6rE0JOpuIdCG0GK8ep6PV2bb/Wg39jheh2fVrvJAIqy5MK ulGwKJHWqXA8HFJiQNKiTDg07f1kqCaPeATQ/a5oBaMPHv8HRVsaOPPUFoWpy7v1 JF3my1iYJlPTitIloR9aKqU6szOf8kK9k8dJ4Chr5tuKrmS5B6uqNijoSlIAqqCk UVnH9z/PNKSWhjTz3EBm =wnPM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-cIiVCE7xJKDOing6CbRd--