Re: [RFC/RFT v2] cfg80211/nl80211: add IBSS API

[Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 779 bytes --]

On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 17:16 +0200, Alina Friedrichsen wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> > Anyway, I think you're confused because cfg80211_assoc_request looks
> > like cfg80211_ibss_params. Trust me -- that will change.
> 
> How much?

It will pass in a cfg80211_bss structure instead of all those parameters
once we move all the stuff into cfg80211.

> > Either way I'm not going to argue this with you anyway, I've already
> > decided to do it this way. You'd have to find many many people who agree
> > with you to convince me otherwise.
> 
> That is not an technical argumentation. That is only plead on human hierarchy. :/

True. But I'm not much interested in technical arguments about this
point since I and others are convinced that this way is better.

johannes

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]