From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Subject: Re: Problem with IEEE80211_MONITORING_INTERVAL
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:27:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1240385238.3404.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874owhffe5.fsf@litku.valot.fi>
Hi Kalle,
> > so I have built the latest wireless-testing tree with a new patches sent
> > by Reinette fixing the DMA issue. So far I have no problems and I am
> > unable to re-produce it. However this is a different AP and I disabled
> > the power control feature for now.
> >
> > I also updated wpa_supplicant and iw to the latest code and assume that
> > no fix in there silently fixed it for me.
> >
> > So we are suspecting that this issue was because of me having 3GB of RAM
> > and running on a 64-bit kernel. Does this makes sense and could be the
> > problem why it kept failing until I unload the iwlagn driver?
>
> I would say that don't make any assumptions until you manage to test
> with the original AP. APs can be broken so many ways.
I would agree with that in general, but I haven been using that AP for
over a year now successfully with the 4965 card in my X61. No problems
ever.
Regards
Marcel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-22 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-15 23:21 Problem with IEEE80211_MONITORING_INTERVAL Marcel Holtmann
2009-04-16 0:21 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-16 0:44 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-16 1:12 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-04-16 1:08 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-04-16 1:16 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-16 6:14 ` Kalle Valo
2009-04-16 9:12 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-16 9:43 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-16 9:49 ` Kalle Valo
2009-04-16 9:58 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-16 9:59 ` Kalle Valo
2009-04-16 10:04 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-16 10:08 ` Kalle Valo
2009-04-16 10:18 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-16 10:23 ` Kalle Valo
2009-04-16 9:46 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-20 17:13 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-04-20 17:20 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-20 17:26 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-04-20 17:32 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-21 19:56 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-04-21 21:19 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-22 7:32 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-04-22 9:03 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-22 9:12 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-04-22 9:45 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-22 11:17 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-04-22 11:53 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-04-22 12:14 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-22 12:56 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-04-22 13:27 ` John W. Linville
2009-04-22 17:35 ` reinette chatre
2009-04-22 5:04 ` Kalle Valo
2009-04-22 7:27 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2009-04-20 18:29 ` Jouni Malinen
2009-04-21 10:47 ` Marcel Holtmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1240385238.3404.0.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kalle.valo@iki.fi \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).