Re: [RFC] rfkill: rewrite

Johannes Berg
2009-03-30T22:09:27Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 591 bytes --]

On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 11:40 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:

> * tosa - done now in new patch, but not even compile-tested
> (http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/patches/kernel/all/LATEST/NNN-rfkill-rewrite.patch)

One problem here remains -- the LED trigger name was forced to be
"tosa-bt" in that code -- that is no longer possible now that struct
rfkill is opaque. I think we should simply standardise the name to
something like
"<rfkill-name>-radio"

Thoughts? I don't want to call it <..>-rfkill or rfkill-<..> because
that would seem to imply inverted polarity.

johannes

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]