From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from senator.holtmann.net ([87.106.208.187]:54571 "EHLO mail.holtmann.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756959AbZEDRX1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 13:23:27 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] add support for showing power constraint IE From: Marcel Holtmann To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1241456088.8683.62.camel@johannes.local> References: <1241453167-3720-1-git-send-email-marcel@holtmann.org> <1241453408.8683.53.camel@johannes.local> <1241454909.2903.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1241455125.8683.60.camel@johannes.local> <1241455848.2903.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1241456088.8683.62.camel@johannes.local> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 10:23:15 -0700 Message-Id: <1241457795.2903.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Johannes, > > just re-based and added the patch for the WPA/RSN length checks. So we > > should be good now in this area. > > Thanks, applied, and really pushed out now. > > Do you think I should cut a new release with all the shiny new parsing > code, or will you work on more :) one other thing that comes to my mind is to have a convenient "iw scan" alias to just trigger scanning all all interfaces. The "dev wlan0" thing is driving my crazy. And most people just have one card only anyway. Do we really need the "dev" versus "phy" details here. I guess they are needed in case someone renames "wlan0" to "phy0" by accident, but personally I prefer that the "dev" one is optional and it falls back to just use the interface name. Regards Marcel