linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT 3/4] cfg80211: add rfkill support
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:38:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1243355933.20399.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1243171957.24236.13.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Hi Dan,

> > plain text document attachment (015-cfg80211-rfkill.patch)
> > To be easier on drivers and users, have cfg80211 register an
> > rfkill structure that drivers can access. When soft-killed,
> > simply take down all interfaces; when hard-killed the driver
> > needs to notify us and we will take down the interfaces
> > after the fact. While rfkilled, interfaces cannot be set UP.
> 
> Any chance we could get something other than EINVAL returned from the
> PRE_UP notifier when the device is rfkilled?  It's useful to get some
> indication of *why* the device can't be brought up.  For example, if the
> device requires firmware but that firmware isn't present, the driver
> will usually return ENOENT because that's what request_firmware()
> returns when it can't find what it needs.  Thus userspace can do
> something intelligent with the error.
> 
> So maybe EL2HLT could be (ab)used here?  I guess technically it's an L1
> halt since the PHY is powered down, but whatever.  The only other stuff
> that seems to use this are the USB 'gadget' drivers.  Either that, or
> lets make an EL1OFF or ERFKILL maybe.

I think that creating ERFKILL is a really good idea. We should do that.

Regards

Marcel



  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-26 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-21 21:59 [RFT 0/4] rfkill improvements Johannes Berg
2009-05-21 21:59 ` [RFT 1/4] net: introduce pre-up netdev notifier Johannes Berg
2009-05-21 21:59 ` [RFT 2/4] rfkill: add function to query state Johannes Berg
2009-05-21 21:59 ` [RFT 3/4] cfg80211: add rfkill support Johannes Berg
2009-05-23  9:52   ` [RFT 3/4 v2] " Johannes Berg
2009-05-24 13:32   ` [RFT 3/4] " Dan Williams
2009-05-24 17:24     ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-26 16:38     ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2009-05-21 21:59 ` [RFT 4/4] iwlwifi: port to cfg80211 rfkill Johannes Berg
2009-05-23  8:49   ` [RFT 4/4 v2] " Johannes Berg
2009-05-23  8:52 ` [RFT 5/4] iwm: port to new " Johannes Berg
2009-05-25  1:22   ` Zhu Yi
2009-05-25  5:13     ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1243355933.20399.1.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=dcbw@redhat.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).