From: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Barinov <alex.barinov@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG REPORT: libertas causing kernel lockups
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:29:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1246901395.21990.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090705125933.5a9f7ce4@dream>
On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 12:59 +0400, Alexander Barinov wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 12:41:42 +0200
> Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 13:03 +0400, Alexander Barinov wrote:
> > > The initial symptom of the bug was system lockup when executing
> > > 'ifdown eth0' with 'BUG: scheduling while atomic'. Trying to
> > > understand the cause of the bug and find a workaround I was able to
> > > find an easier way to reproduce it. By executing
> > > 'cat /proc/net/wireless' I get the same bug:
> > This should have been fixed by
> > 87057825824973f29cf2f37cff1e549170b2d7e6. For some reason everybody
> > seems to have assumed that get_wireless_stats can sleep, which before
> > that commit it could _not_.
>
> The patch you have mentioned was not directly applicable to 2.6.30
> kernel so I pulled wireless-testing git tree and compiled it. This
> deteriorated the situation further - now after executing
> 'cat /proc/net/wireless' I get kernel lockup without any further
> messages.
Can you get anything at all out of the kernel on that? 2.6.29.5 with
quite recent wireless-testing libertas driver works fine with sd8686 on
my machine (hp 2530p laptop with a Ricoh controller). Can you post your
backport of that patch too?
Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-06 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-04 9:03 BUG REPORT: libertas causing kernel lockups Alexander Barinov
2009-07-04 10:41 ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-05 8:59 ` Alexander Barinov
2009-07-06 17:29 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2009-07-06 19:23 ` Alexander Barinov
2009-07-07 6:59 ` Holger Schurig
2009-07-07 8:56 ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-08 7:42 ` Holger Schurig
2009-07-07 20:37 ` Alexander Barinov
2009-07-08 7:32 ` Holger Schurig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1246901395.21990.1.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.barinov@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).