linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
Cc: Thiemo Nagel <thiemo.nagel@ph.tum.de>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	debian-eeepc-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org,
	acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.31-rc2] Writing to /sys/class/rfkill/*/state fails
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:37:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247254662.9709.91.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <71cd59b00907101234w772dc141kff52c7393e698e17@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Corentin,

> > I demand that Thiemo Nagel may or may not have written...
> >
> >> Corentin Chary wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Thiemo Nagel<thiemo.nagel@ph.tum.de>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> Corentin Chary wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Thiemo
> >>>>> Nagel<thiemo.nagel@ph.tum.de> wrote:
> >>>>>> I just tested the new GSM rfkill in 2.6.31-rc2 and I get the following
> >>>>>> on my EeePC 1000HGO:
> >>>>>>   eee:/# cat /sys/class/rfkill/rfkill2/name
> >>>>>>   eeepc-wwan3g
> >>>>>>   eee:/# echo 0 > /sys/class/rfkill/rfkill2/state
> >>>>>>   bash: echo: write error: Operation not permitted
> >>>>>> What could be the reason for that?
> >>>>> Reading the kernel source I can find:
> >>>>>         /*
> >>>>>          * The intention was that userspace can only take control over
> >>>>>          * a given device when/if rfkill-input doesn't control it due
> >>>>>          * to user_claim. Since user_claim is currently unsupported,
> >>>>>          * we never support changing the state from userspace -- this
> >>>>>          * can be implemented again later.
> >>>>>          */
> >>>>> It seems that rfkill should be controlled by /dev/rfkill (cf
> >>>>> Documentation/rfkill.txt).
> >>>>> Maybe network-manager can control that .. But I'm not sure.
> >>>>> Maybe you should CC the wireless mailing list.
> >>>> Thanks for the quick reply.  The interesting thing is, that the direct
> >>>> access works well for eeepc-wlan and eeepc-bluetooth rfkills.  I've CC'd
> >>>> debian-eeepc-devel, maybe they know something.
> >>> Are you sure that it works with newer kernels ?
> >>> This commit should have broken it for all rfkill.
> >>>   commit 19d337dff95cbf76edd3ad95c0cee2732c3e1ec5
> >>>   Author: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> >>>   Date:   Tue Jun 2 13:01:37 2009 +0200
> >
> >> You're right, all rfkills work with 2.6.30, but none works with 2.6.31-rc2.
> >
> > This is the first that I've heard of this. I'd not noticed since I've not
> > needed Bluetooth on my 901 recently.
> >
> >> For the debian-eeepc folks:  2.6.31-rc2 breaks bluetooth toggling using
> >> eeepc-acpi-scripts, but WLAN toggling still works.
> >
> > FSVO "works" (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13390), but that's a
> > different problem.
> >
> > I consider this a regression. It breaks an interface which, though flawed, is
> > ideally suited for scripting use and which eeepc-acpi-scripts uses in shell
> > scripts.
> >
> > /dev/rfkill is not useful in shell scripts.
> 
> Maybe it would be possible with an rfkill command line tool (in C) ?
> Is there such a tool somewhere ?

yes there is:

http://git.sipsolutions.net/?p=rfkill.git

Regards

Marcel



  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-10 19:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4A5716AA.5000903@ph.tum.de>
     [not found] ` <71cd59b00907100545v6f440a19xfc3668826eb1e509@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]   ` <4A5743AB.6090303@ph.tum.de>
     [not found]     ` <71cd59b00907100646h5e0283fcyce5874cc4a19106b@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]       ` <4A575119.9070505@ph.tum.de>
2009-07-10 18:57         ` [2.6.31-rc2] Writing to /sys/class/rfkill/*/state fails Darren Salt
2009-07-10 19:34           ` Corentin Chary
2009-07-10 19:37             ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2009-07-10 19:41           ` [PATCH 2.6.31] rfkill: allow toggling soft state in sysfs again Johannes Berg
2009-07-10 21:09             ` Darren Salt
2009-07-10 21:55               ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-10 23:09                 ` Darren Salt
2009-07-25 20:56                 ` [Acpi4asus-user] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-25 22:35                   ` John W. Linville
2009-07-26 19:32                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1247254662.9709.91.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=corentin.chary@gmail.com \
    --cc=debian-eeepc-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thiemo.nagel@ph.tum.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).