From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>,
wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Possible BUG where mac80211 fails to stop queues
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:48:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1248684480.19945.45.camel@johannes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A6CDE26.3000409@lwfinger.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2640 bytes --]
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 17:52 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> While stress testing the newest version of the open-source firmware
> for BCM43XX devices with the latest pull of wireless-testing, I ran
> into a problem of DMA TX queue overrun. Initially I thought this was
> due to the firmware change; however, I got the same error with the
> standard firmware. I have not seen this before, but it may not be a
> regression as it seems to occur only under special circumstances.
I've also seen it under extreme stress on Intel hardware, cf.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/36497
> The critical code is in b43_dma_tx(), which is called by the .tx
> callback routine registered with mac80211.
>
> After the fragment is transmitted by a call to dma_tx_fragment() at
> line 1353, the routine checks to see if there are sufficient free
> slots (2) to transmit another fragment using the code below:
>
> if ((free_slots(ring) < TX_SLOTS_PER_FRAME) ||
> should_inject_overflow(ring)) {
> /* This TX ring is full. */
> ieee80211_stop_queue(dev->wl->hw,
> skb_get_queue_mapping(skb));
> ring->stopped = 1;
> if (b43_debug(dev, B43_DBG_DMAVERBOSE)) {
> b43dbg(dev->wl, "Stopped TX ring %d\n",
> ring->index);
> }
> }
>
>
> The problem shows up at line 1340 for the next fragment:
>
> B43_WARN_ON(ring->stopped);
>
> if (unlikely(free_slots(ring) < TX_SLOTS_PER_FRAME)) {
> b43warn(dev->wl, "DMA queue overflow\n");
> err = -ENOSPC;
> goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> The system generates the warning for ring->stopped and prints the "DMA
> queue overflow" message.
Right. Exactly the same behaviour as I'm seeing on Intel hardware.
> My understanding is that mac80211 serializes the calls for each TX
> queue, and that the TX callback should not have been entered for this
> case.
>
> If I am not understanding the way that mac80211 works, please correct
> me. I would also appreciate any suggestions for further debugging.
I stared at the mac80211 code for a long time and concluded that it was
a race condition and couldn't really be fixed, see my analysis in the
iwlwifi patch. I'd love to be proved wrong though.
Are you seeing this multiple times? I don't think you have fragmentation
on, do you? At least I didn't and still saw the problem, which seemed a
bit strange, but I really couldn't see any other way for it to happen.
johannes
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-27 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-26 22:52 Possible BUG where mac80211 fails to stop queues Larry Finger
2009-07-27 8:48 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2009-07-27 15:55 ` Larry Finger
2009-07-27 16:04 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1248684480.19945.45.camel@johannes.local \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox