linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [.32-rc3] scheduler: iwlagn consistently high in "waiting for CPU"
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 06:05:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1254974743.7797.21.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200910072034.57511.elendil@planet.nl>

On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 20:34 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Tuesday 06 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > I've checked for 2.6.31.1 now and iwlagn is listed high there too when
> > > the system is idle, but with normal values of 60-100 ms. And phy0 has
> > > normal values of below 10 ms.
> > > I've now rebooted with today's mainline git; phy0 now frequently shows
> > > with values of around 100 ms too (i.e. higher than last time).
> >
> > Mike privately sent me a script to try to capture the latencies with
> > perf, but the perf output does not show any high latencies at all. It
> > looks as if we may have found a bug in latencytop here instead.
> 
> Not sure if it's relevant nor what it means, but I frequently see two lines 
> for iwlagn, e.g:
> 
>     Scheduler: waiting for cpu              102.4 msec         99.7 %
>     .                                         3.3 msec          0.3 %
> 
> I get the same results with both latencytop 0.4 and 0.5.

OK, I see latencytop spikes here on an idle box too, to the tune of up
to a _second_.  Booting with nohz=off seems to have cured it.

I wanted to see if that's also the perf sched record -C N trouble I
warned you not to try when recording with script, but unfortunately,
after pulling this morning...

marge:/root/tmp # perf sched lat --sort=max
Segmentation fault

...perf sched got busted.  Seems likely to be same thing for both
though, as magnitude/frequency of bogons is very similar.

	-Mike


  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-08  4:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-05 13:00 [.32-rc3] scheduler: iwlagn consistently high in "waiting for CPU" Frans Pop
2009-10-05 14:13 ` Frans Pop
2009-10-05 14:24   ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-06 15:49     ` Frans Pop
2009-10-07 17:10       ` Frans Pop
2009-10-07 18:10         ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-07 18:34         ` Frans Pop
2009-10-08  4:05           ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2009-10-08  6:23             ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 13:40             ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-08 14:13               ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 14:54                 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 14:55               ` Frans Pop
2009-10-08 15:09                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-08 18:23                 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 20:34                   ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2009-10-09  3:35                     ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-09  3:51                       ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2009-10-08 20:59                   ` Frans Pop
2009-10-09  3:04                     ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-09  6:35                     ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-09  7:13                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-09  7:55                       ` Sedat Dilek
2009-10-09  8:06                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-09 16:27                       ` Frans Pop
2009-10-09 20:06                         ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 11:24           ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 13:09             ` Frans Pop
2009-10-08 13:18               ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 13:45             ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-08 14:15               ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1254974743.7797.21.camel@marge.simson.net \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=elendil@planet.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).