public inbox for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>,
	"hostap@lists.shmoo.com" <hostap@lists.shmoo.com>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Allow scanning while in authenticated only state
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:16:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1257236174.28469.35.camel@johannes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1257203821.6717.24.camel@maxim-laptop>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1819 bytes --]

On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 01:17 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:

> > There should be no need for doing both disassoc and deauth; just send
> > deauth only if that is needed. This will save one extra frame
> > transmission and speeds up roaming a bit.
> > 
> > Though, is this enough to handle the roaming cases where wpa_supplicant
> > may not try to send either disassociation or deauthentication?

> Currently wpa_supplicant sends only disassociation.
> deauthentication is send only in rare cases, usually due to [suspected]
> authentication error.
> Other that that I don't know, what I need is a clear statement about how
> things should work that is:
> 
> 
> * Should kernel allow authentication while in authenticated? I guess yes
> To same AP? To different APs?

It does allow it to different APs (up to 3/4 at a time), but not to the
same AP -- I plan on fixing the latter case.

> * What should kernel do if it done authentication to several APs?, but
> not association.
> should it timeout, or let wpa_suplicant do it?
> Currently it allows 4 (or 3) such APs, and then then bugs out with
> -ENOSPC

IMHO it should not make the decision on how long authentications are
valid. Any such value might be wrong if wpa_supplicant is really slow,
say it's swapped out.

> * Should kernel allow scanning while in authenticated but not associated
> case? 
> I have send patch to do so, I hope it will be accepted.

I don't think it should, and as such don't think I want to accept the
patch. You need to make a much much better case for it if you want me to
accept it. I see no reason to ever be in a situation where there are
authentications (that aren't either killed off or used to associate) for
a long enough period of time for it to make sense to scan in that time.

johannes

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-03  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-30 21:49 [PATH 0/2] Make driver_nl80211 really work Maxim Levitsky
2009-10-30 21:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] Allow scanning while in authenticated only state Maxim Levitsky
2009-10-31  5:43   ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-31  9:46     ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-10-31 10:02       ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-31 10:33         ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-10-31 10:44           ` Johannes Berg
2009-11-01 20:10           ` Jouni Malinen
2009-11-02 23:17             ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-11-03  8:16               ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2009-10-30 21:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] nl80211: allow to authenticate to access point that we already authenticated Maxim Levitsky
2009-10-31  5:44   ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-31  9:36     ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-10-30 22:33 ` [PATH 0/2] Make driver_nl80211 really work Maxim Levitsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1257236174.28469.35.camel@johannes.local \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=hostap@lists.shmoo.com \
    --cc=j@w1.fi \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox