From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:7025 "EHLO c60.cesmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755206AbZLBE1R (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:27:17 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: allow disabling 40MHz on 2.4GHz From: Pavel Roskin To: Johannes Berg Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , John Linville , linux-wireless In-Reply-To: <1259718190.32171.146.camel@johannes.local> References: <1259688582.32171.97.camel@johannes.local> <1259691446.4806.12.camel@mj> <1259692053.32171.98.camel@johannes.local> <43e72e890912011118w535781a4id4e4572df16267f4@mail.gmail.com> <1259716754.11611.6.camel@mj> <1259718190.32171.146.camel@johannes.local> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:26:55 -0500 Message-Id: <1259728015.4088.0.camel@ct> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 02:43 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > And I would argue that it is -- module parameters are still discouraged, > that doesn't change with adding one. We currently have one in mac80211 > to chose the rate control algorithm, but it too is a special case and > ought to not be required. > > I don't see this parameter as configuration like ack timeout or 10mhz > channels or ... I think this parameter solves a systems integration > issue, not a configuration issue. OK, fair enough. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin