linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Cc: Benoit Papillault <benoit.papillault@free.fr>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mac80211: Improved IBSS merges
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:44:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1266245078.5081.23.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100215134023.GA11947@jm.kir.nu>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 829 bytes --]

On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 15:40 +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:33:54AM +0100, Benoit Papillault wrote:
> > According to $11.1.4 from IEEE 802.11-2007, TSF is reset
> (drv_reset_tsf)
> > on MLME-JOIN, ie only when a new IBSS is created or if an existing
> IBSS
> > is joined, but not on IBSS merges.
> 
> While that may indeed be what the standard says, drv_reset_tsf() may
> be
> needed to allow the driver to actually learn the new timestamp
> correctly
> in the case of merge. Have you verified that the drivers that support
> IBSS do indeed update their timestamps without that call in case there
> is a large difference in the timestamp values that the separate IBSSes
> used before the merge?

Good point. Also, it shouldn't hurt to always reset it, so what's the
point?

johannes

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2010-02-15 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-14 23:33 [PATCH 1/2] mac80211: Improved IBSS merges Benoit Papillault
2010-02-14 23:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] mac80211: Improved IBSS merges even if BSSID is the same Benoit Papillault
2010-02-15  9:28   ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-15 22:24     ` Benoit PAPILLAULT
2010-02-15  9:29   ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-15 13:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] mac80211: Improved IBSS merges Jouni Malinen
2010-02-15 14:44   ` Johannes Berg [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1266245078.5081.23.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=benoit.papillault@free.fr \
    --cc=j@w1.fi \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).