public inbox for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iwlwifi: implement disabling/enabling QoS
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:03:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1269450209.22705.10.camel@wwguy-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1269449068.22705.7.camel@wwguy-ubuntu>

Hi Stanislaw,

On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 09:44 -0700, Guy, Wey-Yi wrote:
> Hi Stanislaw,
>  
> On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 10:21 -0700, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 13:46 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
> > 
> > This really could use "more" text as to why etc.
> > 
> > > +	if (changes & BSS_CHANGED_QOS) {
> > > +		unsigned long flags;
> > > +
> > > +		spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> > > +		priv->qos_data.qos_active = bss_conf->qos_disabled ? 0 : 1;
> > > +		iwl_activate_qos(priv, 1);
> > > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> > > +	}
> > 
> > This seems alright, but we really need to revisit that since there's a
> > lot of odd logic in iwlwifi that makes some sense based on this now but
> > could probably be simplified now. I'll close with Wey-Yi, she worked on
> > QoS here at some point I think.
> > 
> If I understand correctly, the current implementation has problem, by
> just calling iwl_activate_qos(), it did not have the AC setup correctly,
> take a look at the iwl_reset_qos(), it is the only place initialize the
> table, for STA mode, QoS is de-active by default. iwl_activate_qos()
> only change the qos flag, but did not re-initialize the table to proper
> value. 
> 
> Thanks
> Wey
> 
look at it again, please ignore my previous email, mac80211 will send
config_tx which make the ac table correct, so just call
iwl_activate_qos() should be ok.

Thanks
Wey

> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-24 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-23 12:46 [PATCH 1/2] mac80211: add interface for disabling/enabling QoS Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-03-23 12:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] iwlwifi: implement " Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-03-23 16:18   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-23 16:35     ` Johannes Berg
2010-03-23 16:47     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-03-23 17:21   ` Johannes Berg
2010-03-24 16:44     ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-03-24 17:03       ` Guy, Wey-Yi [this message]
2010-03-23 17:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] mac80211: add interface for " Johannes Berg
2010-03-23 17:22   ` Johannes Berg
2010-03-24  9:37   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-03-24 16:13     ` Johannes Berg
2010-03-25 10:46       ` Stanislaw Gruszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1269450209.22705.10.camel@wwguy-ubuntu \
    --to=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox