From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Teemu Paasikivi <ext-teemu.3.paasikivi@nokia.com>
Cc: "linville@tuxdriver.com" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: check whether scan is in progress before queueing scan_work
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 12:27:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1270549677.3929.5.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270549017.7150.28.camel@paavo-desktop>
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 13:16 +0300, Teemu Paasikivi wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 11:06 +0200, ext Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 11:54 +0300, Teemu Paasikivi wrote:
> > > As scan_work is queued from work_work it needs to be checked if scan
> > > has been started during execution of work_work. Otherwise, when hw
> > > scan is used, the stack gets error about hw being busy with ongoing
> > > scan.
> >
> > Does that mean we ask the driver to scan twice? And your particular
> > driver returns busy?
> >
>
> Yes. There seems to be a possibility, that when ieee80211_work_work is
> being executed, __ieee80211_start_scan gets called and it starts a hw
> scan, and also sets local->hw_scan_req etc. (because it looks like
> there's some holes in use of scan_mtx). Result is that work_work queues
> ieee80211_scan_work and when it is executed, as there's already
> hw_scan_req set, it will try to start hw scan again. And as the driver
> used returns busy, scan_work will call ieee80211_scan_completed function
> which leaves the driver (hw more precisely) scanning and the stack
> thinking that it is not anymore scanning.
>
> Obviously this kind of situation doesn't happen very often in normal
> use, but it can be caused quite easily by associating to access points
> in a loop while running scan in another loop.
Makes some sense. Ignore my other email(s), I looked at this in more
detail now.
It would appear that we need to fix some of the locking here,
potentially simply using a single mutex for both work and scan?
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-06 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-06 8:54 [PATCH] mac80211: check whether scan is in progress before queueing scan_work Teemu Paasikivi
2010-04-06 9:06 ` Johannes Berg
2010-04-06 9:08 ` Johannes Berg
2010-04-06 10:16 ` Teemu Paasikivi
2010-04-06 10:27 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2010-04-06 10:29 ` Johannes Berg
2010-04-06 11:05 ` Teemu Paasikivi
2010-04-06 16:23 ` Dan Williams
2010-04-06 17:17 ` Johannes Berg
2010-04-06 18:07 ` Dan Williams
2010-04-07 6:09 ` Teemu Paasikivi
2010-04-09 8:09 ` Johannes Berg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-09 10:07 Teemu Paasikivi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1270549677.3929.5.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=ext-teemu.3.paasikivi@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).