linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Teemu Paasikivi <ext-teemu.3.paasikivi@nokia.com>
To: ext Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "linville@tuxdriver.com" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: check whether scan is in progress before queueing scan_work
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:09:00 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1270620540.7150.51.camel@paavo-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270549759.3929.6.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>

On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 12:29 +0200, ext Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 12:27 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 13:16 +0300, Teemu Paasikivi wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 11:06 +0200, ext Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 11:54 +0300, Teemu Paasikivi wrote:
> > > > > As scan_work is queued from work_work it needs to be checked if scan
> > > > > has been started during execution of work_work. Otherwise, when hw
> > > > > scan is used, the stack gets error about hw being busy with ongoing
> > > > > scan.
> > > > 
> > > > Does that mean we ask the driver to scan twice? And your particular
> > > > driver returns busy?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Yes. There seems to be a possibility, that when ieee80211_work_work is
> > > being executed, __ieee80211_start_scan gets called and it starts a hw
> > > scan, and also sets local->hw_scan_req etc. (because it looks like
> > > there's some holes in use of scan_mtx). Result is that work_work queues
> > > ieee80211_scan_work and when it is executed, as there's already
> > > hw_scan_req set, it will try to start hw scan again. And as the driver
> > > used returns busy, scan_work will call ieee80211_scan_completed function
> > > which leaves the driver (hw more precisely) scanning and the stack
> > > thinking that it is not anymore scanning.
> > > 
> > > Obviously this kind of situation doesn't happen very often in normal
> > > use, but it can be caused quite easily by associating to access points
> > > in a loop while running scan in another loop.
> > 
> > Makes some sense. Ignore my other email(s), I looked at this in more
> > detail now.
> > 
> > It would appear that we need to fix some of the locking here,
> > potentially simply using a single mutex for both work and scan?
> 
> I'm mostly worried about deadlocks between work_mtx and scan_mtx really,
> when we acquire them both like your patch.
> 

I sent a new version of the patch to the linux-wireless. Now both
mutexes are not locked at the same time.


Br,

Teemu



  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-07  6:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-06  8:54 [PATCH] mac80211: check whether scan is in progress before queueing scan_work Teemu Paasikivi
2010-04-06  9:06 ` Johannes Berg
2010-04-06  9:08   ` Johannes Berg
2010-04-06 10:16   ` Teemu Paasikivi
2010-04-06 10:27     ` Johannes Berg
2010-04-06 10:29       ` Johannes Berg
2010-04-06 11:05         ` Teemu Paasikivi
2010-04-06 16:23           ` Dan Williams
2010-04-06 17:17             ` Johannes Berg
2010-04-06 18:07               ` Dan Williams
2010-04-07  6:09         ` Teemu Paasikivi [this message]
2010-04-09  8:09 ` Johannes Berg
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-09 10:07 Teemu Paasikivi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1270620540.7150.51.camel@paavo-desktop \
    --to=ext-teemu.3.paasikivi@nokia.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).