Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Nils Radtke <lkml@Think-Future.de>
Cc: "linville@tuxdriver.com" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG in iwl-agn-rs.c:2076, WAS: iwlagn + some accesspoint == hardlock
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 16:32:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273534324.2370.6740.camel@rchatre-DESK> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100510183639.GA17523@localhost>

On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:36 -0700, Nils Radtke wrote:
>   Today weather was fine again, finally. So testing with .33.3 w/ the patch applied: 
> 
>   http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=127290931304496&w=2
> 
> The kernel kernel .32 was still running before it crashed immediately on wireless activation.
> The crash log showed again at least two messages, the last was as already described in my first
> message, bug from 2010-04-30: I think even the 0x2030 was the same:
> 
> EIP rs_tx_status +x8f/x2030 

You report an issue on 2.6.32 ...

> 
> W/ .33.3 and the above patch applied:

... but then test the patch with 2.6.33.

Which kernel are you focused on?


> Linux mypole 2.6.33.3 #18 SMP PREEMPT Thu May 6 21:51:37 CEST 2010 i686 GNU/Linux
> 
> May 10 19:14:11 [   80.586637] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
> May 10 19:23:17 [  626.476078] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
> May 10 19:23:30 [  638.913740] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
> May 10 19:23:32 [  641.232425] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
> May 10 19:23:54 [  663.392697] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
> May 10 19:23:58 [  666.980247] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
> May 10 19:24:02 [  671.121826] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now

Can you see any impact on your connection speed that can be connected to
these messages?

> Additionally these were logged, could you tell why they're there and what to do? (also .33.3 w/ patch)
> 
> May 10 19:24:16 [  685.079617] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: iwl_tx_agg_start on ra = 00:1a:70:12:23:25 tid = 0
> May 10 19:24:22 [  691.026737] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: iwl_tx_agg_start on ra = 00:1a:70:12:23:25 tid = 0
> May 10 19:28:02 [  911.406162] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: iwl_tx_agg_start on ra = 00:1a:70:12:23:25 tid = 0
> May 10 19:35:38 [ 1367.251240] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: iwl_tx_agg_start on ra = 00:1a:70:12:23:25 tid = 0
> 
> The above "iwl_tx_agg_start" lines happen when connecting - again to a Cisco AP - and the connection gets
> dropped the exact moment when a download is started. It even often drops when dhcp is still negotiating, has
> got it's IP but the nego isn't finished yet. Conn drops, same procedure again and again. This happens only
> with this Cisco AP (which is BTW another one from the "expected_tpt should have been calculated by now" 
> problem).

It could be that some of the queues get stuck. Can you try with the
patches in
http://bugzilla.intellinuxwireless.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2037#c113 ? They
are based on 2.6.33.

Reinette




  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-10 23:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20100503191756.GA3479@localhost>
2010-05-03 19:22 ` kernel BUG in iwl-agn-rs.c:2076, WAS: iwlagn + some accesspoint == hardlock John W. Linville
2010-05-06  9:14   ` Christian Borntraeger
2010-05-06 16:28     ` reinette chatre
2010-05-11 15:50       ` Christian Borntraeger
2010-05-11 17:21         ` reinette chatre
2010-05-12 15:18           ` Christian Borntraeger
2010-05-10 18:36   ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-10 23:32     ` reinette chatre [this message]
2010-05-11  9:41 Nils Radtke
     [not found] <1273768269.2295.1144.camel@rchatre-DESK>
2010-05-14 17:45 ` Nils Radtke
     [not found] <1274380408.2091.9272.camel@rchatre-DESK>
2010-05-31 20:12 ` Nils Radtke
2010-06-02 17:51   ` reinette chatre
2010-06-04 16:57     ` Nils Radtke
2010-06-08 17:46       ` reinette chatre
2010-06-10 14:22         ` Nils Radtke
2010-06-10 16:19           ` reinette chatre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1273534324.2370.6740.camel@rchatre-DESK \
    --to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=lkml@Think-Future.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox