From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:16332 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756108Ab0EKBTa (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2010 21:19:30 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch 1/9] iwlwifi: remove stray mutex_unlock() From: Zhu Yi To: Dan Carpenter Cc: "Chatre, Reinette" , Intel Linux Wireless , "John W. Linville" , "Guy, Wey-Yi W" , "Berg, Johannes" , "Kolekar, Abhijeet" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <20100508162101.GM27064@bicker> References: <20100508162101.GM27064@bicker> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 09:12:53 +0800 Message-ID: <1273540373.27831.40.camel@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 00:21 +0800, Dan Carpenter wrote: > This mutex_unlock() has been here from the initial commit, but as nearly > as I can tell, there isn't a reason for it. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c > index 9dad867..3faa78c 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c > @@ -2482,7 +2482,6 @@ int iwl3945_hw_set_hw_params(struct iwl_priv *priv) > &priv->_3945.shared_phys, GFP_KERNEL); > if (!priv->_3945.shared_virt) { > IWL_ERR(priv, "failed to allocate pci memory\n"); > - mutex_unlock(&priv->mutex); > return -ENOMEM; > } Yeah, a mistake, definitely. Acked-by: Zhu Yi Thanks, -yi