Re: commit 062bee448bd539580ef9f64efe50fdfe04eeb103 broke my iwlagn 5100

["Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>]

Hi Florian,

On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 16:22 -0700, Florian Klink wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:44:21 -0700, "Guy, Wey-Yi"
> <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> wrote:
> > Hi Florian,
> > 
> > On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 10:36 -0700, Johannes Berg wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 10:27 -0700, Guy, Wey-Yi wrote:
> >> > Johannes,
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 09:36 -0700, Florian Klink wrote:
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > >
> >> > > I did a dmesg with 2.6.35-rc5 and debug=0x43fff.
> >> > > You can get it here: http://pastebin.com/Q6eCdPZR
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > based on the log sent by Florian, I did not see bss_info_change with
> >> > current BSSID from mac80211. any thought?
> >> >
> >> > I am expected to see something like this,
> >> >
> >> > [165796.572969] ieee80211 phy3: U iwl_bss_info_changed changes =
> >> > 0xFD
> >> > [165796.572972] ieee80211 phy3: U iwl_bss_info_changed BSSID
> >> > 00:25:9c:d0:9f:e1
> >> > [165796.572976] ieee80211 phy3: U iwl_bss_info_changed ERP_PREAMBLE 1
> >>
> >> That'd only happen _after_ association, not before, and assoc fails
> >> here.
> >>
> > Could you try different channel instead of channel 12 to see if the
> > problem still there?
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Wey
> >>
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> very strange, now I can't reproduce the problem anymore, association
> works with channel 12 and other ones, too!
> I have no idea why it's now working...
> 
> Could this commit affect any link tolerance/timeouts, because I was
> able to bisect the problem?
> 
Not sure what happen, but please do let us know if you see the problem
pop up again. I do not think this patch should affect the link
tolerance.

Thanks
Wey
>