From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:62193 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751699Ab0HRQq6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:46:58 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iwlagn: do not check for AP mode for WEP keys From: "Guy, Wey-Yi" To: Johannes Berg Cc: "linville@tuxdriver.com" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" In-Reply-To: <1282149604.5249.5.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> References: <1282149322-17928-1-git-send-email-wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> <1282149322-17928-2-git-send-email-wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> <1282149604.5249.5.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:51:21 -0700 Message-ID: <1282150281.4235.1.camel@wwguy-huron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 09:40 -0700, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 09:35 -0700, Wey-Yi Guy wrote: > > From: Johannes Berg > > > > Even when we configure WEP keys in AP mode > > ones without a station pointer are default > > keys, so don't check for AP mode here. > > I don't think this needs to go into 2.6.35 (or 2.6.36, which I think you > meant?) since we don't support AP mode. > so 2.6.37? Wey