linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: cancel scan in ieee80211_restart_hw
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:29:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1283246981.3733.7.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100830193701.GF30864@tuxdriver.com>

On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 15:37 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:

> > > -	/* use this reason, __ieee80211_resume will unblock it */
> > > +	ieee80211_scan_cancel(local);
> > > +
> > > +	/* use this reason, ieee80211_reconfig will unblock it */
> > 
> > Hmm, yes .. but how will this interact with hw scan?
> 
> You tell me -- I would think that calling ieee80211_restart_hw
> would effectively abandon all hope of a hardware scan completing.
> Should the caller call ieee80211_scan_completed(..., 1)?  Or should
> we do that (or equivalent) here too?

Yeah, I guess the caller probably should since it may have internal
state that needs resetting for scans as well. Maybe we should
WARN_ON(scan in progress) here for the hw scan case, and do what you're
proposing only for SW scan?

johannes


  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-31  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-30 19:14 [PATCH] mac80211: cancel scan in ieee80211_restart_hw John W. Linville
2010-08-30 19:17 ` Johannes Berg
2010-08-30 19:37   ` John W. Linville
2010-08-31  9:29     ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2010-08-31 19:25       ` [PATCH] mac80211: cancel scan in ieee80211_restart_hw if software scan pending John W. Linville
2010-09-01 10:29         ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-01 18:58           ` John W. Linville
2010-09-01 19:02             ` John W. Linville
2010-09-01 19:10             ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-01 20:17               ` John W. Linville
2010-09-02  8:29                 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-01 20:17               ` [PATCH] mac80211: only cancel software-based scans on suspend John W. Linville

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1283246981.3733.7.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).