From: "Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] iwlwifi: avoid dropping muttex in iwl_scan_cancel_timeout
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 07:53:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1283525585.5211.16.camel@wwguy-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1283515056-11523-9-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com>
Hi Gruszka,
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 04:57 -0700, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> Don't drop mutex when waiting for scan complete. Use STATUS_HW_SCAN bit
> to check if scanning is currency pending, because STATUS_SCANNING will
> be cleared only with priv->mutex taken.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c | 17 ++++++++---------
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c
> index 6ab7bb3..7e4faaf 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c
> @@ -138,22 +138,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(iwl_scan_cancel);
> */
> int iwl_scan_cancel_timeout(struct iwl_priv *priv, unsigned long ms)
> {
> - unsigned long now = jiffies;
> + unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(ms);
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&priv->mutex);
>
> - iwl_do_scan_abort(priv);
> + IWL_DEBUG_SCAN(priv, "Scan cancel timeout\n");
>
> - if (ms) {
> - mutex_unlock(&priv->mutex);
> - while (!time_after(jiffies, now + msecs_to_jiffies(ms)) &&
> - test_bit(STATUS_SCANNING, &priv->status))
> - msleep(20);
> - mutex_lock(&priv->mutex);
> + iwl_do_scan_abort(priv);
>
> + while (time_before_eq(jiffies, timeout)) {
> + if (!test_bit(STATUS_SCAN_HW, &priv->status))
> + break;
> + msleep(20);
> }
>
> - return test_bit(STATUS_SCANNING, &priv->status);
> + return test_bit(STATUS_SCAN_HW, &priv->status);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(iwl_scan_cancel_timeout);
>
Should patch 7 and 8 merge into single patch?
Wey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-03 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-03 11:57 [PATCH 0/13] iwlwifi: rewrite iwl-scan.c to avoid race conditions Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-03 11:57 ` [PATCH 01/13] iwlwifi: remove unused conf variables Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-03 11:57 ` [PATCH 02/13] iwlwifi: unify scan start checks Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-03 14:23 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-03 14:25 ` Berg, Johannes
2010-09-06 7:30 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-03 11:57 ` [PATCH 03/13] iwlwifi: move scan completed flags handling Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-03 14:29 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-03 14:31 ` Berg, Johannes
2010-09-03 11:57 ` [PATCH 04/13] iwlwifi: cancel scan when down the device Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-03 12:07 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-03 14:38 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-06 7:32 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-03 11:57 ` [PATCH 05/13] iwlwifi: use IWL_DEBUG_SCAN Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-03 11:57 ` [PATCH 06/13] iwlwifi: report scan completion when abort fail Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-03 11:57 ` [PATCH 07/13] iwlwifi: do not queue abort_scan work if can sleep Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-03 11:57 ` [PATCH 08/13] iwlwifi: avoid dropping muttex in iwl_scan_cancel_timeout Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-03 14:53 ` Guy, Wey-Yi [this message]
2010-09-06 7:33 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-03 11:57 ` [PATCH 09/13] iwlwifi: rewrite scan completion Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-03 11:57 ` [PATCH 10/13] iwlwifi: force scan complete after timeout Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-03 12:15 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-03 11:57 ` [PATCH 11/13] iwlwifi: assure we complete scan in scan_abort and scan_check works Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-03 11:57 ` [PATCH 12/13] iwlwifi: do not force complete scan too early Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-03 11:57 ` [PATCH 13/13] mac80211: wait for scan work complete before restarting hw Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-03 12:21 ` [PATCH 0/13] iwlwifi: rewrite iwl-scan.c to avoid race conditions Johannes Berg
2010-09-03 12:55 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-03 13:11 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-03 15:04 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-06 7:37 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1283525585.5211.16.camel@wwguy-ubuntu \
--to=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).