Re: [PATCH v2] omap: beagle: add support for wl1271 on the board file

[Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@nokia.com>]

On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 14:20 +0200, ext Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi Luca,
> 
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:17:33AM -0500, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> >On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 13:45 +0200, ext Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 03:20:03AM -0500, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> >> > static struct mtd_partition omap3beagle_nand_partitions[] = {
> >> >@@ -163,12 +168,25 @@ static void __init beagle_display_init(void)
> >> >
> >> > #include "sdram-micron-mt46h32m32lf-6.h"
> >> >
> >> >+struct wl12xx_platform_data omap_beagle_wlan_data __initdata = {
> >> >+	.irq = OMAP_GPIO_IRQ(OMAP_BEAGLE_WLAN_IRQ_GPIO),
> >>
> >> can you pass IRQ as a struct resource ?
> >
> >Sorry, I don't understand what you mean here.  Can you clarify?
> 
> static struct resource wl12xx_resource[] = {
> 	{
> 		.start	= OMAP_GPIO_IRQ(OMAP_BEAGLE_WLAN_IRQ_GPIO),
> 		.flags	= IORESOURCE_IRQ,
> 	},
> };
> 
> static struct platform_device wl12xx_platform_device = {
> 	.resource	= wl12xx_resource,
> 	.num_resources	= ARRAY_SIZE(wl12xx_resource),
> 	.....
> };
> 
> then on driver you would:
> 
> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> 
> something like that :-)

Ah, I see.  Thanks for the explanation.  I guess we could do that in a
separate patch.  The zoom board file already uses this .irq element, so
this patch would not be the appropriate place to change it.

Is it okay if I deal with that after I'm done with the current patch?