From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:60931 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932178Ab0JDScE (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2010 14:32:04 -0400 Subject: Re: wireless-testing (2.6.36-rc6): inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage. From: Johannes Berg To: Ben Greear Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "John W. Linville" In-Reply-To: <4CAA158F.10108@candelatech.com> References: <4CA4F000.2060509@candelatech.com> <1285933789.3739.34.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <4CAA158F.10108@candelatech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 20:31:55 +0200 Message-ID: <1286217115.3620.46.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 10:57 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > >> ================================= > >> [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] > >> 2.6.36-rc6-wl+ #20 > >> --------------------------------- > >> inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage. > >> kworker/u:0/5 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: > >> (&(&list->lock)->rlock){+.?...}, at: [] packet_rcv+0x1f3/0x27a > > > > I think this is due to > > > > commit 5ed3bc7288487bd4f891f420a07319e0b538b4fe > > Author: John W. Linville > > Date: Thu Jun 24 14:38:30 2010 -0400 > > > > mac80211: use netif_receive_skb in ieee80211_tx_status callpath > > Before I go hacking on this, is anyone already working on it? I'm not aware of anyone. johannes