From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Cc: Luis Rodriguez <Luis.Rodriguez@atheros.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Srinivasa Duvvuri <Srinivasa.Duvvuri@atheros.com>,
Matt Smith <Matt.Smith@atheros.com>,
Bennyam Malavazi <Bennyam.Malavazi@atheros.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: Deny new BA agreements from being started during offchannel operation
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 09:18:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1286435892.3657.9.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinOTsYKFpQkg2B7GVMF-eKykFd8LM1m8xmtXX7j@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 13:48 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Johannes Berg
> <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 12:12 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> >> Good question, will ieee80211_offchannel_ps_disable() possibly be
> >> called during suspend? I can imagine its possible. So how about we
> >> check for local->quiescing prior to lifting the flag only:
> >
> > Or suspended?
>
> If we're suspended we would be quiesced so I do not see us calling
> ieee80211_offchannel_ps_disable() then, but we can also just bail out
> if quescing or suspended on ieee80211_offchannel_ps_disable() and
> friends.
Oh, wait, yeah, while quiescing we stop the workqueue so we can't be
processing this, so we should be fine. We might still be off-channel
while suspending which is odd, and then we might lift the BA block
earlier than you'd want.
But then again, come to think of it, why are you doing this anyway? I'm
not convinced of the whole idea, it's all racy. I'm starting to think
that this patch won't help anything since we'll still be racy and start
BA agreements just before we block, _and_ if we're a station and going
off-channel we'll be going into powersave which means we won't actually
get the addBA frame until we return.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-07 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-06 18:50 [PATCH] mac80211: Deny new BA agreements from being started during offchannel operation Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-10-06 18:55 ` Johannes Berg
2010-10-06 19:12 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-10-06 19:19 ` Johannes Berg
2010-10-06 20:48 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-10-07 7:18 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2010-10-07 17:21 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-10-07 17:56 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1286435892.3657.9.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=Bennyam.Malavazi@atheros.com \
--cc=Luis.Rodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=Matt.Smith@atheros.com \
--cc=Srinivasa.Duvvuri@atheros.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).