* [PATCH v2] ath5k: Adjust opmode when interfaces are removed.
@ 2010-10-08 19:01 greearb
2010-10-12 1:44 ` Bruno Randolf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: greearb @ 2010-10-08 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-wireless; +Cc: Ben Greear
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Otherwise, if there is an AP and a STATION, and AP
is removed, the NIC will not revert back to STATION mode.
Reported-by: Eliad Peller <eliad@wizery.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
---
v1 -> v2: Make setting opmode un-conditional, rename
method to: ath5k_update_bssid_mask_and_opmode
:100644 100644 dad7265... c9732a6... M drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c
index dad7265..c9732a6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
#include "reg.h"
#include "debug.h"
#include "ani.h"
+#include "../debug.h"
static int modparam_nohwcrypt;
module_param_named(nohwcrypt, modparam_nohwcrypt, bool, S_IRUGO);
@@ -517,12 +518,14 @@ struct ath_vif_iter_data {
bool need_set_hw_addr;
bool found_active;
bool any_assoc;
+ enum nl80211_iftype opmode;
};
static void ath_vif_iter(void *data, u8 *mac, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
{
struct ath_vif_iter_data *iter_data = data;
int i;
+ struct ath5k_vif *avf = (void *)vif->drv_priv;
if (iter_data->hw_macaddr)
for (i = 0; i < ETH_ALEN; i++)
@@ -539,13 +542,34 @@ static void ath_vif_iter(void *data, u8 *mac, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
iter_data->need_set_hw_addr = false;
if (!iter_data->any_assoc) {
- struct ath5k_vif *avf = (void *)vif->drv_priv;
if (avf->assoc)
iter_data->any_assoc = true;
}
+
+ /* Calculate combined mode - when APs are active, operate in AP mode.
+ * Otherwise use the mode of the new interface. This can currently
+ * only deal with combinations of APs and STAs. Only one ad-hoc
+ * interfaces is allowed above.
+ */
+ if (avf->opmode == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP)
+ iter_data->opmode = NL80211_IFTYPE_AP;
+ else
+ if (iter_data->opmode == NL80211_IFTYPE_UNSPECIFIED)
+ iter_data->opmode = avf->opmode;
}
-void ath5k_update_bssid_mask(struct ath5k_softc *sc, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
+static void ath_do_set_opmode(struct ath5k_softc *sc)
+{
+ struct ath5k_hw *ah = sc->ah;
+ ath5k_hw_set_opmode(ah, sc->opmode);
+ ATH5K_DBG(sc, ATH5K_DEBUG_MODE, "mode setup opmode %d (%s)\n",
+ sc->opmode,
+ ath_opmode_to_string(sc->opmode) ?
+ ath_opmode_to_string(sc->opmode) : "UKNOWN");
+}
+
+void ath5k_update_bssid_mask_and_opmode(struct ath5k_softc *sc,
+ struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
{
struct ath_common *common = ath5k_hw_common(sc->ah);
struct ath_vif_iter_data iter_data;
@@ -558,6 +582,7 @@ void ath5k_update_bssid_mask(struct ath5k_softc *sc, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
memset(&iter_data.mask, 0xff, ETH_ALEN);
iter_data.found_active = false;
iter_data.need_set_hw_addr = true;
+ iter_data.opmode = NL80211_IFTYPE_UNSPECIFIED;
if (vif)
ath_vif_iter(&iter_data, vif->addr, vif);
@@ -567,10 +592,18 @@ void ath5k_update_bssid_mask(struct ath5k_softc *sc, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
&iter_data);
memcpy(sc->bssidmask, iter_data.mask, ETH_ALEN);
+ sc->opmode = iter_data.opmode;
+ if (sc->opmode == NL80211_IFTYPE_UNSPECIFIED)
+ /* Nothing active, default to station mode */
+ sc->opmode = NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION;
+
+ ath_do_set_opmode(sc);
+
if (iter_data.need_set_hw_addr && iter_data.found_active)
ath5k_hw_set_lladdr(sc->ah, iter_data.active_mac);
- ath5k_hw_set_bssid_mask(sc->ah, sc->bssidmask);
+ if (ath5k_hw_hasbssidmask(sc->ah))
+ ath5k_hw_set_bssid_mask(sc->ah, sc->bssidmask);
}
static void
@@ -582,15 +615,9 @@ ath5k_mode_setup(struct ath5k_softc *sc, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
/* configure rx filter */
rfilt = sc->filter_flags;
ath5k_hw_set_rx_filter(ah, rfilt);
-
- if (ath5k_hw_hasbssidmask(ah))
- ath5k_update_bssid_mask(sc, vif);
-
- /* configure operational mode */
- ath5k_hw_set_opmode(ah, sc->opmode);
-
- ATH5K_DBG(sc, ATH5K_DEBUG_MODE, "mode setup opmode %d\n", sc->opmode);
ATH5K_DBG(sc, ATH5K_DEBUG_MODE, "RX filter 0x%x\n", rfilt);
+
+ ath5k_update_bssid_mask_and_opmode(sc, vif);
}
static inline int
@@ -2688,7 +2715,7 @@ ath5k_attach(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
SET_IEEE80211_PERM_ADDR(hw, mac);
memcpy(&sc->lladdr, mac, ETH_ALEN);
/* All MAC address bits matter for ACKs */
- ath5k_update_bssid_mask(sc, NULL);
+ ath5k_update_bssid_mask_and_opmode(sc, NULL);
regulatory->current_rd = ah->ah_capabilities.cap_eeprom.ee_regdomain;
ret = ath_regd_init(regulatory, hw->wiphy, ath5k_reg_notifier);
@@ -2786,7 +2813,6 @@ static int ath5k_add_interface(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
{
struct ath5k_softc *sc = hw->priv;
int ret;
- struct ath5k_hw *ah = sc->ah;
struct ath5k_vif *avf = (void *)vif->drv_priv;
mutex_lock(&sc->lock);
@@ -2850,18 +2876,6 @@ static int ath5k_add_interface(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
sc->num_adhoc_vifs++;
}
- /* Set combined mode - when APs are configured, operate in AP mode.
- * Otherwise use the mode of the new interface. This can currently
- * only deal with combinations of APs and STAs. Only one ad-hoc
- * interfaces is allowed above.
- */
- if (sc->num_ap_vifs)
- sc->opmode = NL80211_IFTYPE_AP;
- else
- sc->opmode = vif->type;
-
- ath5k_hw_set_opmode(ah, sc->opmode);
-
/* Any MAC address is fine, all others are included through the
* filter.
*/
@@ -2905,7 +2919,7 @@ ath5k_remove_interface(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
else if (avf->opmode == NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC)
sc->num_adhoc_vifs--;
- ath5k_update_bssid_mask(sc, NULL);
+ ath5k_update_bssid_mask_and_opmode(sc, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&sc->lock);
}
--
1.7.2.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ath5k: Adjust opmode when interfaces are removed.
2010-10-08 19:01 [PATCH v2] ath5k: Adjust opmode when interfaces are removed greearb
@ 2010-10-12 1:44 ` Bruno Randolf
2010-10-12 2:10 ` Ben Greear
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bruno Randolf @ 2010-10-12 1:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: greearb; +Cc: linux-wireless
On Sat October 9 2010 04:01:15 greearb@candelatech.com wrote:
> From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
>
> Otherwise, if there is an AP and a STATION, and AP
> is removed, the NIC will not revert back to STATION mode.
>
> Reported-by: Eliad Peller <eliad@wizery.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2: Make setting opmode un-conditional, rename
> method to: ath5k_update_bssid_mask_and_opmode
>
> :100644 100644 dad7265... c9732a6...
> :M drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c
>
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c | 66
> ++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 26
> deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c index dad7265..c9732a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
> #include "reg.h"
> #include "debug.h"
> #include "ani.h"
> +#include "../debug.h"
>
> static int modparam_nohwcrypt;
> module_param_named(nohwcrypt, modparam_nohwcrypt, bool, S_IRUGO);
> @@ -517,12 +518,14 @@ struct ath_vif_iter_data {
> bool need_set_hw_addr;
> bool found_active;
> bool any_assoc;
> + enum nl80211_iftype opmode;
> };
>
> static void ath_vif_iter(void *data, u8 *mac, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
> {
> struct ath_vif_iter_data *iter_data = data;
> int i;
> + struct ath5k_vif *avf = (void *)vif->drv_priv;
>
> if (iter_data->hw_macaddr)
> for (i = 0; i < ETH_ALEN; i++)
> @@ -539,13 +542,34 @@ static void ath_vif_iter(void *data, u8 *mac, struct
> ieee80211_vif *vif) iter_data->need_set_hw_addr = false;
>
> if (!iter_data->any_assoc) {
> - struct ath5k_vif *avf = (void *)vif->drv_priv;
> if (avf->assoc)
> iter_data->any_assoc = true;
> }
> +
> + /* Calculate combined mode - when APs are active, operate in AP mode.
> + * Otherwise use the mode of the new interface. This can currently
> + * only deal with combinations of APs and STAs. Only one ad-hoc
> + * interfaces is allowed above.
the comment reference to "above" does not make sense here any more.
> + */
> + if (avf->opmode == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP)
> + iter_data->opmode = NL80211_IFTYPE_AP;
> + else
> + if (iter_data->opmode == NL80211_IFTYPE_UNSPECIFIED)
> + iter_data->opmode = avf->opmode;
> }
>
> -void ath5k_update_bssid_mask(struct ath5k_softc *sc, struct ieee80211_vif
> *vif) +static void ath_do_set_opmode(struct ath5k_softc *sc)
> +{
> + struct ath5k_hw *ah = sc->ah;
> + ath5k_hw_set_opmode(ah, sc->opmode);
> + ATH5K_DBG(sc, ATH5K_DEBUG_MODE, "mode setup opmode %d (%s)\n",
> + sc->opmode,
> + ath_opmode_to_string(sc->opmode) ?
> + ath_opmode_to_string(sc->opmode) : "UKNOWN");
> +}
what's the point of this function? just to add the debug print?
> +void ath5k_update_bssid_mask_and_opmode(struct ath5k_softc *sc,
> + struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
> {
> struct ath_common *common = ath5k_hw_common(sc->ah);
> struct ath_vif_iter_data iter_data;
> @@ -558,6 +582,7 @@ void ath5k_update_bssid_mask(struct ath5k_softc *sc,
> struct ieee80211_vif *vif) memset(&iter_data.mask, 0xff, ETH_ALEN);
> iter_data.found_active = false;
> iter_data.need_set_hw_addr = true;
> + iter_data.opmode = NL80211_IFTYPE_UNSPECIFIED;
>
> if (vif)
> ath_vif_iter(&iter_data, vif->addr, vif);
> @@ -567,10 +592,18 @@ void ath5k_update_bssid_mask(struct ath5k_softc *sc,
> struct ieee80211_vif *vif) &iter_data);
> memcpy(sc->bssidmask, iter_data.mask, ETH_ALEN);
>
> + sc->opmode = iter_data.opmode;
> + if (sc->opmode == NL80211_IFTYPE_UNSPECIFIED)
> + /* Nothing active, default to station mode */
> + sc->opmode = NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION;
> +
> + ath_do_set_opmode(sc);
> if (iter_data.need_set_hw_addr && iter_data.found_active)
> ath5k_hw_set_lladdr(sc->ah, iter_data.active_mac);
>
> - ath5k_hw_set_bssid_mask(sc->ah, sc->bssidmask);
> + if (ath5k_hw_hasbssidmask(sc->ah))
> + ath5k_hw_set_bssid_mask(sc->ah, sc->bssidmask);
> }
>
> static void
> @@ -582,15 +615,9 @@ ath5k_mode_setup(struct ath5k_softc *sc, struct
> ieee80211_vif *vif) /* configure rx filter */
> rfilt = sc->filter_flags;
> ath5k_hw_set_rx_filter(ah, rfilt);
> -
> - if (ath5k_hw_hasbssidmask(ah))
> - ath5k_update_bssid_mask(sc, vif);
> -
> - /* configure operational mode */
> - ath5k_hw_set_opmode(ah, sc->opmode);
> -
> - ATH5K_DBG(sc, ATH5K_DEBUG_MODE, "mode setup opmode %d\n", sc->opmode);
> ATH5K_DBG(sc, ATH5K_DEBUG_MODE, "RX filter 0x%x\n", rfilt);
> +
> + ath5k_update_bssid_mask_and_opmode(sc, vif);
> }
>
> static inline int
> @@ -2688,7 +2715,7 @@ ath5k_attach(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct
> ieee80211_hw *hw) SET_IEEE80211_PERM_ADDR(hw, mac);
> memcpy(&sc->lladdr, mac, ETH_ALEN);
> /* All MAC address bits matter for ACKs */
> - ath5k_update_bssid_mask(sc, NULL);
> + ath5k_update_bssid_mask_and_opmode(sc, NULL);
>
> regulatory->current_rd = ah->ah_capabilities.cap_eeprom.ee_regdomain;
> ret = ath_regd_init(regulatory, hw->wiphy, ath5k_reg_notifier);
> @@ -2786,7 +2813,6 @@ static int ath5k_add_interface(struct ieee80211_hw
> *hw, {
> struct ath5k_softc *sc = hw->priv;
> int ret;
> - struct ath5k_hw *ah = sc->ah;
> struct ath5k_vif *avf = (void *)vif->drv_priv;
>
> mutex_lock(&sc->lock);
> @@ -2850,18 +2876,6 @@ static int ath5k_add_interface(struct ieee80211_hw
> *hw, sc->num_adhoc_vifs++;
> }
>
> - /* Set combined mode - when APs are configured, operate in AP mode.
> - * Otherwise use the mode of the new interface. This can currently
> - * only deal with combinations of APs and STAs. Only one ad-hoc
> - * interfaces is allowed above.
> - */
> - if (sc->num_ap_vifs)
> - sc->opmode = NL80211_IFTYPE_AP;
> - else
> - sc->opmode = vif->type;
> -
> - ath5k_hw_set_opmode(ah, sc->opmode);
> -
i think it makes sense to set the opmode here. and also do the same in
ath5k_remove_interface. that way we figure out the opmode when interfaces are
added/removed.
> /* Any MAC address is fine, all others are included through the
> * filter.
> */
> @@ -2905,7 +2919,7 @@ ath5k_remove_interface(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
> else if (avf->opmode == NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC)
> sc->num_adhoc_vifs--;
>
> - ath5k_update_bssid_mask(sc, NULL);
> + ath5k_update_bssid_mask_and_opmode(sc, NULL);
> mutex_unlock(&sc->lock);
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ath5k: Adjust opmode when interfaces are removed.
2010-10-12 1:44 ` Bruno Randolf
@ 2010-10-12 2:10 ` Ben Greear
2010-10-12 2:48 ` Bruno Randolf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ben Greear @ 2010-10-12 2:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruno Randolf; +Cc: linux-wireless
On 10/11/2010 06:44 PM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> On Sat October 9 2010 04:01:15 greearb@candelatech.com wrote:
>> +
>> + /* Calculate combined mode - when APs are active, operate in AP mode.
>> + * Otherwise use the mode of the new interface. This can currently
>> + * only deal with combinations of APs and STAs. Only one ad-hoc
>> + * interfaces is allowed above.
>
> the comment reference to "above" does not make sense here any more.
This patch is already in..but I can send a followup cleanup patch.
>
>> + */
>> + if (avf->opmode == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP)
>> + iter_data->opmode = NL80211_IFTYPE_AP;
>> + else
>> + if (iter_data->opmode == NL80211_IFTYPE_UNSPECIFIED)
>> + iter_data->opmode = avf->opmode;
>> }
>>
>> -void ath5k_update_bssid_mask(struct ath5k_softc *sc, struct ieee80211_vif
>> *vif) +static void ath_do_set_opmode(struct ath5k_softc *sc)
>> +{
>> + struct ath5k_hw *ah = sc->ah;
>> + ath5k_hw_set_opmode(ah, sc->opmode);
>> + ATH5K_DBG(sc, ATH5K_DEBUG_MODE, "mode setup opmode %d (%s)\n",
>> + sc->opmode,
>> + ath_opmode_to_string(sc->opmode) ?
>> + ath_opmode_to_string(sc->opmode) : "UKNOWN");
>> +}
>
> what's the point of this function? just to add the debug print?
Yes. At one point, I had it being called from several places..but now it's
called from only one place currently, I think. I could make it explicitly
inline code if someone cared.
>> - /* Set combined mode - when APs are configured, operate in AP mode.
>> - * Otherwise use the mode of the new interface. This can currently
>> - * only deal with combinations of APs and STAs. Only one ad-hoc
>> - * interfaces is allowed above.
>> - */
>> - if (sc->num_ap_vifs)
>> - sc->opmode = NL80211_IFTYPE_AP;
>> - else
>> - sc->opmode = vif->type;
>> -
>> - ath5k_hw_set_opmode(ah, sc->opmode);
>> -
>
> i think it makes sense to set the opmode here. and also do the same in
> ath5k_remove_interface. that way we figure out the opmode when interfaces are
> added/removed.
It calls ath5k_mode_setup(sc, vif), which sets rx filter, updates bssid mask,
and sets the opmode.
>> @@ -2905,7 +2919,7 @@ ath5k_remove_interface(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
>> else if (avf->opmode == NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC)
>> sc->num_adhoc_vifs--;
>>
>> - ath5k_update_bssid_mask(sc, NULL);
>> + ath5k_update_bssid_mask_and_opmode(sc, NULL);
>> mutex_unlock(&sc->lock);
And that recalculates opmode and bssid mask on removal.
Or maybe I'm mis-understanding your suggestion?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ath5k: Adjust opmode when interfaces are removed.
2010-10-12 2:10 ` Ben Greear
@ 2010-10-12 2:48 ` Bruno Randolf
2010-11-10 19:44 ` Ben Greear
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bruno Randolf @ 2010-10-12 2:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Greear; +Cc: linux-wireless
On Tue October 12 2010 11:10:43 Ben Greear wrote:
> On 10/11/2010 06:44 PM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> > On Sat October 9 2010 04:01:15 greearb@candelatech.com wrote:
> >> +
> >> + /* Calculate combined mode - when APs are active, operate in AP mode.
> >> + * Otherwise use the mode of the new interface. This can currently
> >> + * only deal with combinations of APs and STAs. Only one ad-hoc
> >> + * interfaces is allowed above.
> >
> > the comment reference to "above" does not make sense here any more.
>
> This patch is already in..but I can send a followup cleanup patch.
just for the comment it's probably not worth it, but...
> >> ieee80211_vif *vif) +static void ath_do_set_opmode(struct ath5k_softc
> >> *sc)
> >> +{
> >> + struct ath5k_hw *ah = sc->ah;
> >> + ath5k_hw_set_opmode(ah, sc->opmode);
> >> + ATH5K_DBG(sc, ATH5K_DEBUG_MODE, "mode setup opmode %d (%s)\n",
> >> + sc->opmode,
> >> + ath_opmode_to_string(sc->opmode) ?
> >> + ath_opmode_to_string(sc->opmode) : "UKNOWN");
> >> +}
> >
> > what's the point of this function? just to add the debug print?
>
> Yes. At one point, I had it being called from several places..but now it's
> called from only one place currently, I think. I could make it explicitly
> inline code if someone cared.
i think i do care. could you please just open-code it at the one place where
you call this function?
> > i think it makes sense to set the opmode here. and also do the same in
> > ath5k_remove_interface. that way we figure out the opmode when interfaces
> > are added/removed.
>
> It calls ath5k_mode_setup(sc, vif), which sets rx filter, updates bssid
> mask, and sets the opmode.
>
> >> @@ -2905,7 +2919,7 @@ ath5k_remove_interface(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
> >>
> >> else if (avf->opmode == NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC)
> >>
> >> sc->num_adhoc_vifs--;
> >>
> >> - ath5k_update_bssid_mask(sc, NULL);
> >> + ath5k_update_bssid_mask_and_opmode(sc, NULL);
> >>
> >> mutex_unlock(&sc->lock);
>
> And that recalculates opmode and bssid mask on removal.
>
> Or maybe I'm mis-understanding your suggestion?
i guess my suggestion was to solve it directly in add/remove_interface, as i
think that would me a more obvious place to do it, but as your patch already
got already merged: nevermind. your solution has advantages too.
thanks,
bruno
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ath5k: Adjust opmode when interfaces are removed.
2010-10-12 2:48 ` Bruno Randolf
@ 2010-11-10 19:44 ` Ben Greear
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ben Greear @ 2010-11-10 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruno Randolf; +Cc: linux-wireless, ath5k-devel
On 10/11/2010 07:48 PM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> On Tue October 12 2010 11:10:43 Ben Greear wrote:
>> On 10/11/2010 06:44 PM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
>>> On Sat October 9 2010 04:01:15 greearb@candelatech.com wrote:
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Calculate combined mode - when APs are active, operate in AP mode.
>>>> + * Otherwise use the mode of the new interface. This can currently
>>>> + * only deal with combinations of APs and STAs. Only one ad-hoc
>>>> + * interfaces is allowed above.
>>>
>>> the comment reference to "above" does not make sense here any more.
>>
>> This patch is already in..but I can send a followup cleanup patch.
>
> just for the comment it's probably not worth it, but...
>
>>>> ieee80211_vif *vif) +static void ath_do_set_opmode(struct ath5k_softc
>>>> *sc)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct ath5k_hw *ah = sc->ah;
>>>> + ath5k_hw_set_opmode(ah, sc->opmode);
>>>> + ATH5K_DBG(sc, ATH5K_DEBUG_MODE, "mode setup opmode %d (%s)\n",
>>>> + sc->opmode,
>>>> + ath_opmode_to_string(sc->opmode) ?
>>>> + ath_opmode_to_string(sc->opmode) : "UKNOWN");
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> what's the point of this function? just to add the debug print?
>>
>> Yes. At one point, I had it being called from several places..but now it's
>> called from only one place currently, I think. I could make it explicitly
>> inline code if someone cared.
>
> i think i do care. could you please just open-code it at the one place where
> you call this function?
I just posted a patch to do these two things.
Thanks for the suggestions!
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-10 19:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-10-08 19:01 [PATCH v2] ath5k: Adjust opmode when interfaces are removed greearb
2010-10-12 1:44 ` Bruno Randolf
2010-10-12 2:10 ` Ben Greear
2010-10-12 2:48 ` Bruno Randolf
2010-11-10 19:44 ` Ben Greear
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).