Re: [PATCH 2/2] iwlwifi: one less commit_rxon while scan

["Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>]

Hi Stanislaw,

On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 01:42 -0700, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 03:39:53PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > Almost anywhere in the code we avoid committing rxon while performing
> > scan, and make rxon commit when scan complete. Some current patches do
> > not follow that rule. We have that problem at least in
> > iwlagn_confirue_filter(), iwl_update_chain_flags() and
> > iwl_bg_bt_full_concurrency().
> 
> Any comments about iwl_update_chain_flags, iwl_bg_bt_full_concurrency ?
> I would like to know how to deal with them, should we deffer commit_rxon
> to scan complete, or cancel the scan. Or maybe this is no problem
> at all, because in example committing rxon vs scan was problem of
> older firmware?
> 

iwl_update_chain_flags() is used when PSP mode change,
iwl_bg_bt_full_concurrency() is used only for BT coex and in BT full
concurrency mode. For both case, I do not see any reason we can not
defer to scan complete.

Thanks
Wey