From: "Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] iwlwifi: warn when send tx power settings during scan
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:38:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288017516.3435.7.camel@wwguy-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101025083436.GB2343@redhat.com>
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 01:34 -0700, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> Hi Wey
>
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 08:23:05AM -0700, Guy, Wey-Yi wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 08:04 -0700, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > > + if (WARN_ONCE(test_bit(STATUS_SCAN_HW, &priv->status),
> > > + "TX Power requested while scanning!\n"))
> > > + return -EIO;
> >
> > what reason we want to return -EIO instead of -EAGAIN?
>
> I though EAGAIN should be used for file nonblock I/O, but seems
> it can be used anywhere when resources are unavailable. If it
> make difference, we can apply this patch instead:
>
> From 7905309bfeae1a8374d3caa757d9f9383c15d700 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:23:41 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 1/7 v2] iwlwifi: warn when send tx power settings during scan
>
> Add WARN_ONCE when scanning is pending. Use STATUS_SCAN_HW bit since we
> can have scan canceled or completed but STATUS_SCANNING bit still set.
>
> v1 -> v2: replace EIO to EAGAIN
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Acked-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
> ---
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-25 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-22 15:04 [PATCH 1/7] iwlwifi: warn when send tx power settings during scan Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-22 15:04 ` [PATCH 2/7] iwlwifi: send tx_power_cmd synchronously Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-25 14:46 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-10-22 15:04 ` [PATCH 3/7] iwlwifi: fix set_tx_power vs scan Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-25 14:47 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-10-22 15:04 ` [PATCH 4/7] iwlwifi: avoid commit rxon during scan in iwlagn_configure_filter Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-25 14:47 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-10-22 15:04 ` [PATCH 5/7] iwlwifi: avoid commit rxon during scan in iwlagn_bt_traffic_change_work Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-25 14:47 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-10-22 15:04 ` [PATCH 6/7] iwlwifi: defer update power mode while scan Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-22 15:33 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-10-25 8:18 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-25 14:47 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-10-22 15:04 ` [PATCH 7/7] iwlwifi: avoid commit rxon during scan in iwl_set_no_assoc Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-25 14:48 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-10-22 15:23 ` [PATCH 1/7] iwlwifi: warn when send tx power settings during scan Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-10-25 8:34 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-10-25 14:38 ` Guy, Wey-Yi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1288017516.3435.7.camel@wwguy-ubuntu \
--to=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).