From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:2391 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757863Ab0JYU1Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:27:24 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC] iwlwifi: Convert to new PCI PM framework From: "Guy, Wey-Yi" To: "John W. Linville" Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" In-Reply-To: <1288037557-5197-1-git-send-email-linville@tuxdriver.com> References: <1288037557-5197-1-git-send-email-linville@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:26:33 -0700 Message-Id: <1288038393.22425.3.camel@wwguy-ubuntu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 13:12 -0700, John W. Linville wrote: > Use the new PCI PM and let the PCI core code handle the PCI-specific > details of power transitions. > > Based on similarly titled ath9k patch posted by Rafael J. Wysocki. > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" > Signed-off-by: John W. Linville > --- > Compile-tested only...do the iwl_pci_resume changes look right? Looks right to me, but I don't know much about how PCI PM works. Wey