From: "Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iwlagn: simplify iwlagn_tx_skb
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:51:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1289584262.1935.0.camel@wwguy-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101112164620.GA10877@redhat.com>
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 08:46 -0800, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 07:52:05AM -0800, Guy, Wey-Yi wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 23:47 -0800, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > > We can simplify length calculation in iwlagn_tx_skb, that function
> > > is enough complex, without fuzz it more than necessary.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tx.c | 33 ++++++++++------------------
> > > 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tx.c
> > > index 2b078a9..1205cec 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tx.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tx.c
> > > @@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ int iwlagn_tx_skb(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > > dma_addr_t phys_addr;
> > > dma_addr_t txcmd_phys;
> > > dma_addr_t scratch_phys;
> > > - u16 len, len_org, firstlen, secondlen;
> > > + u16 len, firstlen, secondlen;
> > > u16 seq_number = 0;
> > > __le16 fc;
> > > u8 hdr_len;
> > > @@ -687,30 +687,23 @@ int iwlagn_tx_skb(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > > */
> > > len = sizeof(struct iwl_tx_cmd) +
> > > sizeof(struct iwl_cmd_header) + hdr_len;
> > > -
> > > - len_org = len;
> > > - firstlen = len = (len + 3) & ~3;
> > > -
> > > - if (len_org != len)
> > > - len_org = 1;
> > > - else
> > > - len_org = 0;
> > > + firstlen = (len + 3) & ~3;
> > >
> > > /* Tell NIC about any 2-byte padding after MAC header */
> > > - if (len_org)
> > > + if (firstlen != len)
> > > tx_cmd->tx_flags |= TX_CMD_FLG_MH_PAD_MSK;
> > >
> > > /* Physical address of this Tx command's header (not MAC header!),
> > > * within command buffer array. */
> > > txcmd_phys = pci_map_single(priv->pci_dev,
> > > - &out_cmd->hdr, len,
> > > + &out_cmd->hdr, firstlen,
> > > PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > dma_unmap_addr_set(out_meta, mapping, txcmd_phys);
> > > - dma_unmap_len_set(out_meta, len, len);
> > > + dma_unmap_len_set(out_meta, len, firstlen);
> >
> > it is possible len != firstlen, right?
>
> Yes it is, firstlen is aligned up to 4 byes value, txcmd_phys dma map
> size is firstlen and in consequence I use it every time with txcmd_phys.
>
> > > /* Add buffer containing Tx command and MAC(!) header to TFD's
> > > * first entry */
> > > priv->cfg->ops->lib->txq_attach_buf_to_tfd(priv, txq,
> > > - txcmd_phys, len, 1, 0);
> > > + txcmd_phys, firstlen, 1, 0);
> > >
> > > if (!ieee80211_has_morefrags(hdr->frame_control)) {
> > > txq->need_update = 1;
> > > @@ -721,23 +714,21 @@ int iwlagn_tx_skb(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > >
> > > /* Set up TFD's 2nd entry to point directly to remainder of skb,
> > > * if any (802.11 null frames have no payload). */
> > > - secondlen = len = skb->len - hdr_len;
> > > - if (len) {
> > > + secondlen = skb->len - hdr_len;
> > > + if (secondlen > 0) {
> > > phys_addr = pci_map_single(priv->pci_dev, skb->data + hdr_len,
> > > - len, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
> > > + secondlen, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
> > > priv->cfg->ops->lib->txq_attach_buf_to_tfd(priv, txq,
> > > - phys_addr, len,
> > > + phys_addr, secondlen,
> > > 0, 0);
> > > }
> > >
> > > scratch_phys = txcmd_phys + sizeof(struct iwl_cmd_header) +
> > > offsetof(struct iwl_tx_cmd, scratch);
> > >
> > > - len = sizeof(struct iwl_tx_cmd) +
> > > - sizeof(struct iwl_cmd_header) + hdr_len;
> > > /* take back ownership of DMA buffer to enable update */
> > > pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(priv->pci_dev, txcmd_phys,
> > > - len, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > > + firstlen, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> >
> > same here, "firstlen" not necessary equal "len"
>
> I guess its enough to sync just "len" but I prefer to use the
> size we used to map dma.
>
ok, it make sense
Acked-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-12 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-12 7:47 [PATCH 1/3] iwl3945: remove unused len_org variable Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-11-12 7:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] iwlagn: simplify iwlagn_tx_skb Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-11-12 15:52 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-11-12 16:46 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-11-12 17:51 ` Guy, Wey-Yi [this message]
2010-11-12 7:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] iwlwifi: kill elapsed_jiffies Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-11-12 15:53 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-11-12 8:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] iwl3945: remove unused len_org variable Sedat Dilek
2010-11-12 8:56 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-11-12 15:32 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1289584262.1935.0.camel@wwguy-ubuntu \
--to=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).