From: "Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iwlagn: implement layout-agnostic EEPROM reading
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:30:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291876238.10280.176.camel@wwguy-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101209014850.GA2915@tuxdriver.com>
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 17:48 -0800, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 03:33:11PM -0800, Guy, Wey-Yi wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 12:19 -0800, John W. Linville wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:45:18AM -0800, Guy, Wey-Yi wrote:
>
> > > > So it is really judgment call, we plan to release both 6005 and 6030
> > > > uCode in the next few weeks and hardware should be on the market early
> > > > next year. If by the time when hardware become available, distro already
> > > > move to .38, then I am ok with it. What you think?
> > >
> > > What about a patch to disable those devices in 2.6.37, and leave the
> > > existing EEPROM code alone for that release?
> > >
> >
> > I don't think it is an option to disable all the new devices for .37
> > since we commit to support them in .37 kernel,
>
> It certainly is an option. Missing hardware support for one release
> versus potentially destabilizing all existing iwlwifi users seems
> like an obvious trade-off to me. I trust Johannes, of course, but
> we all make subtle mistakes from time to time.
>
> > How about re-work the patch to keep the orig. EEPROM reading method for
> > older devices, but using new EEPROM method for the newer devices
> > (6005/6030/...). it that work for .37 kernel?
>
> I suppose this could work, although it sounds like an even bigger
> patch. I guess we would need to see the patch.
>
as matter as fact, I think the patch will be smaller since the old code
will not be removed. I will ask Johannes to rework the patch and see if
it works for you
Thanks
Wey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-09 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-07 17:37 [PATCH 0/3] iwlwifi fix for 2.6.37 Wey-Yi Guy
2010-12-07 17:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] iwlagn: rename enhanced txpower fields Wey-Yi Guy
2010-12-07 17:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] iwlagn: implement layout-agnostic EEPROM reading Wey-Yi Guy
2010-12-07 19:28 ` John W. Linville
2010-12-07 19:45 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-12-08 20:19 ` John W. Linville
2010-12-08 23:33 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-12-09 1:48 ` John W. Linville
2010-12-09 6:30 ` Guy, Wey-Yi [this message]
2010-12-07 17:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] iwlwifi: minor txp entries fix Wey-Yi Guy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1291876238.10280.176.camel@wwguy-ubuntu \
--to=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
--cc=ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).